Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off
I haven’t heard of Eif, band?
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off
Ulcerate - Everything Is Fire
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off
I have to check Ulcerate, my Death Metal game is not to strong tbh
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off
Definitely my favorite music genre of all time
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off
I love quite a decent amount of Death Metal records but I know I have to dive deeper in the genre. When it is the time I’d appreciate some recs
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off
Hell yeah
|
| |
Listening to nespithe forever sounds like a hilarious form of punishment
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
Nah, that's the Merzbox
|
| |
Finishing inside a babe during us and them is ecstasy.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
What a run to release this, WYWH, Animals and The Wall in succession.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
This year is gonna be my Pink Floyd year
First listen to any PF album
This is smooooooth
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off
I'm in the high-fidelity first-class traveling section i think I need a leeeeeeeaaaaarrrrrrr jet
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
@kalk: I'm kinda shocked you haven't listened to them yet, considering how much prog you listen to
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
@Koris: I know, right? I did a music history lesson thing for King Crimson, most of Genesis and most of Yes, but somehow never for PF. So 2024 is gonna be my PF year
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Excuse the hipsterism, but you should go chronological.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
kalk not having heard PF is legitimatelly bizarre
although I guess these guys do often get accused of being more art-rock than prog, so maybe this is the irrefutable evidence the naysayers needed, lol
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
heh heh lol
No but really what on Earth are you talking about?
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
@Demon The art rock vs prog distinction might have played a role in this ngl. That and my Steven Wilson fatigue, as Porcupine Tree were compared to PF so much
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
@Eg: in prog circles there are distinction between different "schools of prog", idk call it. AOR is a famous one, including also the early material of Kansas, that was undinably prog.
Art Rock is basically all the nice sounding stuff. Samples, melodic solos, 4/4 time signatures, focus on production to create an atmosphere, all of this. Some would say all the nice stuff is art rock and the annoying stuff is "real prog".
Some people say art rock isn't very proggy at all and because it's so popular even stuff like early Muse is considered prog, even though it's rather alt rock than anything else.
I can see why people say this, but really, Dark Side of the Moon feels like prog, come on
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
yeah, kinda maybe... does the passage of time change how these terms are interpreted? I mean (early) prog was meant more in the sense of actually being 'progressive' (rather than a 'sound' as such) and now people have the benefit of a vast pool of knowledge placing (then) relatively unheard material of the time alongside releases that made it big. I think, maybe? Do Floyd now get less credit / lambaste (delete as appropriate) for being masters of prog because the internet has taught us King Crimson exist (easiest example) and thus now get described as 'art rock' instead in some circles? Is this retrospective and out-of-context changing of what the landscape was at the time grossly unfair? Were KC actually a lot bigger (at the time) than I thought? Interesting topic
alternative comment: Animals is prog then because that album is annoying af. WYWH is art rock confirmed because it is nice, it soothes my ear holes, lol gottem
|
| |
|
|
