The Mars Volta Octahedron
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
PanasonicYouth
June 26th 2009


7413 Comments


Avirov is correct. Two completely different bands. TBS is actually good and probably deserves a 5, though I've only heard one album. This, on the other hand, is nowhere NEAR a 5.

ScorpionStan
June 28th 2009


1911 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

haha this review is a really well-diguised track-by-track. still like it though.

ninjuice
June 28th 2009


6760 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

TBS is actually good and probably deserves a 5, though I've only heard one album. This, on the other hand, is nowhere NEAR a 5.


lol

Shrapnel94
June 28th 2009


2213 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off

Are you implying that New Again deserves a 5?

Taxt
June 28th 2009


1605 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off

"haha this review is a really well-diguised track-by-track. still like it though."



Yeah, I started out trying to stay away from a track by track but it kind of turned into one haha.

londoncalling457
June 28th 2009


2712 Comments


This album is definitely great but I still like Bedlam a lot more. I'm having trouble rating this but it will probably end up around a 4.

sba4life
July 12th 2009


364 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5 | Sound Off

Probably the best since FTM. The last two were a mess.

lauriej
July 12th 2009


1713 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

stfu bedlam kicks ass



and its supposed to sound like a mess, its their most chaotic album

sba4life
July 13th 2009


364 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5 | Sound Off

i didn't like it.u stfu.lol

Zizzer
August 7th 2009


915 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Bedlam kicked major ass.



This is taking some time, but it's growing on me.

bodiesinflight57
September 1st 2009


870 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

It's a very good record, not a 5, but still very good...



...the review is as well, until the last paragraph which ruins any hint of objectivity



Not bad for a first go though

Taxt
September 6th 2009


1605 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off

After 3 months, I need to lower the rating. This is pretty insubstantial, especially compared to The Mars Volta's back catalog.

Still an excellent album, but the replay value is not there for me.

LepreCon
September 6th 2009


5481 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off

Mackie you have 2 AC/DC albums as 5s, so i'm going to ignore your opinions

"but they raawwwwk!"!1121"


Can't believe I missed this. Yes, those two AC/DC albums do happen to rock and what's more they are way more 5-worthy than this.

oathfbass
September 6th 2009


388 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off

AC/DC?



no way

LepreCon
September 6th 2009


5481 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off

ya way

Just because they are accessible, not very technical and definitely not pretentious does not mean they are not good

IndieGuitarist
September 6th 2009


149 Comments


fag

oathfbass
September 6th 2009


388 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off

"

Just because they are accessible, not very technical and definitely not pretentious does not mean they are not good"



but they aren't good lol which make it even worse

Greggers
September 6th 2009


2375 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

AC/DC have a bunch of good songs but I get bored of them quite easily.

Greggers
September 6th 2009


2375 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Not always

Greggers
September 6th 2009


2375 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Not denying that, just saying that pretentiousness isn't always a good trait



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy