Yah. Everyone starts somewhere though....

i guess...

Album Rating: 1.0

omg xD 'given up' too heavy for ya? well, how 'bout some nice britney spears to cool you off, eh? ;]



honestly, 'given up' is the only song on here that actually made me kinda stick my head up, but the rest was weak, poppy muck. no idea why the hell did they release this album.



and delson's "solos" blow badly as well xD

Album Rating: 3.0

Okay, this review is bad, i'll admit it, but when i copied and pasted from word, half of the review got taken out so i rewriting it right now. No Given Up is not too heavy for me, i just don't like it as much as some of the other tracks on here. THe reason i put cussing in the cons is because chester sounds really bad when he swears and i think the swearing kind of took down the value of the music. If you losers took the time to look through my ratings you would see plenty of bands that cuss

Album Rating: 1.0 | Sound Off

I agree that the cussing in this album seems childish and almost forced. It definitely detracts from the album.

I still don't think your 5 is justified...

Lincoln Park is awesome have you all seen this video of them?

http://www.woozyfly.com/?c=4207

^^^What the fuck did that have to do with 'Lincoln Park'?

If you losers took the time to look through my ratings you would see plenty of bands that cuss

Album Rating: 3.0

i think i'm justified with 3 pages of negs

You got 3 pages of negs cause your review sucks. That doesnt justify calling everyone losers.

Album Rating: 1.5

Forgot to neg, h/o.

Album Rating: 4.0

To give something a 5 when most people hate it means that there has to be some great justification towards it. The majority say it's bad, therefore you have to write a well worded, generally long review with evidence to support your rationale

It's not the fact that you have to write well because most people agree that the album sucks, it's the fact that you should write well and support your opinion thoroughly. Period. Public opinion shouldn't play into reviewing, aside from making you up your ante a bit when doling out an unorthodox opinion.

That said, review still delivers like a paraplegic mailman.

Album Rating: 4.0

True, however, a lot of people are very intimidated when it comes to writing a review on something that's widely hated or disliked. I usually look forward to reading a review with a completely different rating than everyone else because they generally have to be great reviews to compete with the others. This one was pretty bad though

Agreed. It's sad to hear praise for a formulaic band

Album Rating: 5.0

scars, if there are "flaws in some songs" it shouldn't get a 5. 4 or 4.5 but if theres anything "wrong" with an album in your opinion, it isn't perfect.

Album Rating: 3.0

thank you, i'm retyping this as we speak, if you read my other comment^^^ you would no why there is only one pparagraph about the flaws. That said, expect new review up soon

Album Rating: 5.0

But still, one paragraph can exploit many flaws, therefore not deserving of a 5.

i think i'm justified with 3 pages of negs

chiodos? I kinda disagree... I'll look up an interview for you where he says they try very hard to avoid repetition and any basic choral structure.

^^^^^Their is a huge difference between saying something and doing something! Clearly, Linkin Park are extremely formulaic. This Message Edited On 01.09.08