The Doors The Doors
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
Electric City
July 25th 2007


15756 Comments


Oh my god, please stop.

KingGhidorah
July 25th 2007


64 Comments


Some K-Fed maybe? Lindsay Lohan?

So because he dosen't like Revolver's favorite bands he likes shitty pop music? God, you're a moron.

I liked your Sabbath review because it mixed humor but also had some description. This one is just really lazy.

pretension, poor poetry posing as rock lyrics, tons of studio wankery, and a front man with an ego matched perhaps only by David Lee Roth.


Reminds me of Tool.

Doppelganger
July 25th 2007


3124 Comments


Seriously, what does it take to recieve a smash from the banhammer?

hyperboleking
July 25th 2007


407 Comments


"Oh ban him! Delete him! Kill him! He's mean in his reviews! He writes bad reviews and we always ban bad reviewers, just look at some of the fanboy Led Zeppelin and Tool reviews!"

FR33L0RD
July 25th 2007


6401 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

hyperbole, are you deaf?

shame on you

hyperboleking
July 25th 2007


407 Comments


kingghidorah-- i don't like tool either. ewwww, 15 minute songs with three different riffs. why not just make 3 5 minute songs with a riff each, i say.

Tyler
Emeritus
July 25th 2007


7927 Comments


It has nothing to do with you writing negative reviews, it has to do with you spamming the site with atrociously written ones.
Negative reviews can be well written (see Med's GNR review) and they can be funny. Yours are neither.

hyperboleking
July 25th 2007


407 Comments


fr33-- no, i heard all 12 minutes of the droning sitar. i hated it.

Merkaba33
July 25th 2007


703 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

well I've yet to see a fanboy submit like 8 reviews in 2 days.

hyperboleking
July 25th 2007


407 Comments


cocaine-- everyone who says they're written badly use a shifting rationale to hide the real reason: you think the insults are juvenile. Oh well. It's not as though all it says is that Jim Morrison sucks. It says why this band sucks... the sitar, the 10 minute songs, the poor poetry, the self importance.

hyperboleking
July 25th 2007


407 Comments


merk-- i don't think that's so. i've just gotten more attention than fanboys because fanboy reviews are boring and mine are not, thus the long line of comments/views.

MrKite
July 25th 2007


5020 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

We get it; you don't like sitars.

EDIT: shit, too late.This Message Edited On 07.24.07

hyperboleking
July 25th 2007


407 Comments


anyhow my next review will b a pretty positive one-- a 4-- but again it won't be a fanboy review. it also won't be posted until tomorrow, as i am limiting to two a day due to the backlash from yesterdays um... six i think. lol.

Merkaba33
July 25th 2007


703 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

yours aren't boring but there hideous. but no i really don't think ive seen a fanboy submit that many reviews. see if you submitted these over a span of say a year, i wouldn't be mad. but these were all just rushed. why?, i don't know why.

and tool only has a few songs over the ten minute marker but whatev. you probably judged em off one song.

Tyler
Emeritus
July 25th 2007


7927 Comments


just because your review isnt boring doesn't mean it's good. i'm saying they're poorly written because they are. these are immature rants and nothing more. it's almost as if you read a couple maddox articles, went "he's teh funny lolz" and tried to apply his writing style to shitty, sardonic and cliched reviews. Personally I'd rather hear pedantic admiration for the poor attempt at poetry found on the album than your awful attempt at critiquing it. I'd sooner hear about the monotonous droning in a positive light that actually explains it as opposed to your, as mentioned earlier, tepid and lame attempts at insulting it. This Message Edited On 07.24.07

hyperboleking
July 25th 2007


407 Comments


merk-- judged tool off of "lateralus," the entire album. i'm giving a review for that soon hopefully.

slave-- yeah i think people will be interested because then they can see i really do like music. i just have specific tastes and standards. anyway just as a little hint the album was released in the sixties and contains one of the most highly regarded rock songs of all time. it happens to be my favorite band (well, before they gave into excess and banality.)

hyperboleking
July 25th 2007


407 Comments


cocaine-- i can edit the review and add to my description of the sitar the exact scale used, the exact notes used, the exact tempo used, and the exact studio effects used, if you'd like.

somehow i think that'd be boring though.

Tyler
Emeritus
July 25th 2007


7927 Comments


you're totally missing the point.
http://www.sputnikmusic.com/album.php?reviewid=8957
read this and see how a negative review is written. and stop acting like these albums actually warrant a one. and nobody cares that you're about to review led zeppelin.

hyperboleking
July 25th 2007


407 Comments


i'm not reviewing led zeppelin. i have mixed feelings about zeppelin so it would be a rather boring review. "well i like this, but i hate this, so it makes for an 'okay' listen."

i don't want to be schooled on how to write a review, either. as long as i'm not breaking the rules, i am happy with what i do.

Merkaba33
July 25th 2007


703 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

can't wait for your lateralus review. i'll be there. that is if your not deleted by then. lol. im just joshin ya.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy