Oh my god, please stop.
|
| |
Some K-Fed maybe? Lindsay Lohan?
So because he dosen't like Revolver's favorite bands he likes shitty pop music? God, you're a moron.
I liked your Sabbath review because it mixed humor but also had some description. This one is just really lazy.
pretension, poor poetry posing as rock lyrics, tons of studio wankery, and a front man with an ego matched perhaps only by David Lee Roth.
Reminds me of Tool.
|
| |
Seriously, what does it take to recieve a smash from the banhammer?
|
| |
"Oh ban him! Delete him! Kill him! He's mean in his reviews! He writes bad reviews and we always ban bad reviewers, just look at some of the fanboy Led Zeppelin and Tool reviews!"
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
hyperbole, are you deaf?
shame on you
|
| |
kingghidorah-- i don't like tool either. ewwww, 15 minute songs with three different riffs. why not just make 3 5 minute songs with a riff each, i say.
|
| |
It has nothing to do with you writing negative reviews, it has to do with you spamming the site with atrociously written ones.
Negative reviews can be well written (see Med's GNR review) and they can be funny. Yours are neither.
|
| |
fr33-- no, i heard all 12 minutes of the droning sitar. i hated it.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
well I've yet to see a fanboy submit like 8 reviews in 2 days.
|
| |
cocaine-- everyone who says they're written badly use a shifting rationale to hide the real reason: you think the insults are juvenile. Oh well. It's not as though all it says is that Jim Morrison sucks. It says why this band sucks... the sitar, the 10 minute songs, the poor poetry, the self importance.
|
| |
merk-- i don't think that's so. i've just gotten more attention than fanboys because fanboy reviews are boring and mine are not, thus the long line of comments/views.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
We get it; you don't like sitars.
EDIT: shit, too late.This Message Edited On 07.24.07
|
| |
anyhow my next review will b a pretty positive one-- a 4-- but again it won't be a fanboy review. it also won't be posted until tomorrow, as i am limiting to two a day due to the backlash from yesterdays um... six i think. lol.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
yours aren't boring but there hideous. but no i really don't think ive seen a fanboy submit that many reviews. see if you submitted these over a span of say a year, i wouldn't be mad. but these were all just rushed. why?, i don't know why.
and tool only has a few songs over the ten minute marker but whatev. you probably judged em off one song.
|
| |
just because your review isnt boring doesn't mean it's good. i'm saying they're poorly written because they are. these are immature rants and nothing more. it's almost as if you read a couple maddox articles, went "he's teh funny lolz" and tried to apply his writing style to shitty, sardonic and cliched reviews. Personally I'd rather hear pedantic admiration for the poor attempt at poetry found on the album than your awful attempt at critiquing it. I'd sooner hear about the monotonous droning in a positive light that actually explains it as opposed to your, as mentioned earlier, tepid and lame attempts at insulting it. This Message Edited On 07.24.07
|
| |
merk-- judged tool off of "lateralus," the entire album. i'm giving a review for that soon hopefully.
slave-- yeah i think people will be interested because then they can see i really do like music. i just have specific tastes and standards. anyway just as a little hint the album was released in the sixties and contains one of the most highly regarded rock songs of all time. it happens to be my favorite band (well, before they gave into excess and banality.)
|
| |
cocaine-- i can edit the review and add to my description of the sitar the exact scale used, the exact notes used, the exact tempo used, and the exact studio effects used, if you'd like.
somehow i think that'd be boring though.
|
| |
you're totally missing the point.
http://www.sputnikmusic.com/album.php?reviewid=8957
read this and see how a negative review is written. and stop acting like these albums actually warrant a one. and nobody cares that you're about to review led zeppelin.
|
| |
i'm not reviewing led zeppelin. i have mixed feelings about zeppelin so it would be a rather boring review. "well i like this, but i hate this, so it makes for an 'okay' listen."
i don't want to be schooled on how to write a review, either. as long as i'm not breaking the rules, i am happy with what i do.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
can't wait for your lateralus review. i'll be there. that is if your not deleted by then. lol. im just joshin ya.
|
| |
|