Album Rating: 3.0
The album is meh and this review sucked. Especially the last bit.
|
| |
[quote=Josh D.]Awesome review, I couldn't have said it better myself. Finally a review that does the band justice. Funny as well.[/quote] The review is terrible. Steerpike hit it dead on- Horrible grammar and lame attempts at jokes. Jokes that you would laugh at however. It seems the both of you think it is better to just flame the band and their style more than their music.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
He said the vocals were bad and the riffs sucked, what else do you want?
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.5
his arguments don't justify why the band sucks
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off
He said the vocals were bad and the riffs sucked, what else do you want?
He could have said that in a soundbite. Just saying something sucks isn't a review, you have to actually explain yourself. Durr!
He failed to explain why he thought the way he did, and he said all of it in what looked like a first draft written by 4th grader who just learned how to swear.
His review basically put it in a more funny way than I could.
That's sad.
Quit crying because I like the brutal honesty of his opinions and you get hard over the band.
First of all, I would not call what he said brutal honesty. More like petulent, whiny bitching.
Second, I could give a flying fuck what his rating is. If this is the way he formatted a review with the exact same rating I gave it, I would still neg him for being a barely literate crybaby. It sounds to me like you're just struggling to grasp onto some kind of lifeline so long as it agrees with you.
Third, if you want to see what a well-written negative review looks like, read Shadows' review of The Crusade by Trivium.
Finally, if you want to continue this argument, you will lose because I know what I'm talking about and you don't.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off
I like this simply because it was funny.
And I watch movies that are funny in how ridiculously bad they are. That doesn't make them good movies.
As you can clearly read, he talked about hopes and expectations, and being disappointed.
Whining.
He just took that frustration out in rant on how much he dislikes it with bad grammar.
A badly typed, petulent rant is not a review. It's emotional masturbation.
I have already heard it enough to know how much I dislike it, making this review unnecessary, yet comical to me.
We don't write reviews for people who already own the albums and have formed their own opinions.
What's said is how pathetic it is to see someone sit behind their computer and think they are oh so omnipotent because they can think of witty insults on the internet.
Don't get pissed at me. I can't help that I'm the next stage of human evolution.
I'm sorry I forgot the hierarchy
That's right, you did forget. You know what else you forgot? It's almost 5:30 and you still haven't fetched me a dining couch and a hot chick to feed me grapes. Chop chop!
When I said awesome, I was a little elated because it is a relief to see a review not fellating A7X.
What, the ones rating it a 3 weren't good enough? Did you need this poorly written rant to feel validated? Write your own damn review if you think there needs to be one.This Message Edited On 07.14.07
|
| |
The review is terrible. Steerpike hit it dead on- Horrible grammar and lame attempts at jokes.
There are alot of reviews like that, why would this one deserve the endless berating you guys keep spewing forth?
I think, for all its unholy and hitherto unseen grammar problems, that this is a good review. It's only his fifth, and to be honest, its better than most fifth attempts I've seen, mine included. There are other reviews on this site that go into far less detail about their albums that are still good. Quit trying to strike up stupid arguments.
A badly typed, petulent rant is not a review. It's emotional masturbation.
Yes it is. I don't see how this wouldn't qualify as a review.
|
| |
My comments were constructive.
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.5
I negged it. It's not a review. It's a rant packed with grammatical errors, syntax butchery, no actual description of the music, a lot of pointless whining, stiflingly unfunny attempts at jokes, and more space devoted to completely irrelevant details about the band and the album packaging than the content of the CD.
I could crap a better review than this.
Basicly what I said but you explained yourself. Just like the review he made some bulls*** opinions but never explained, and made formating and spelling errors along the way.
edit:This could never rival liZer's review Mudvaynian.This Message Edited On 07.14.07
|
| |
How did he not explain his opinions?
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
The review is fine, you people are such pussies. A review doesn't have to be a step-by-step analysis, an objective summary or anything in particular.
Did he tell you what he heard? Yes
Did he tell you what he thought? Yes
Could he have said more? Probably.
Get over it you babbling little babies. This Message Edited On 07.14.07
|
| |
That pretty much sums it up.
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
Most Avenged Sevenfold albums have only one track worth listening to, but this one has two. "Sidewinder" and "Burn It Down" are both really good tracks.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
mmmmmmmmmega fail for this user's opinion.
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
he's 100% correct actually. I'd pick those 2 as well
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
mmmmmmmmmega fail for this user's opinion.
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
god this band is poopy juice
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
no bands sound like A7X except for the bands they rip off
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
except for the bands they rip off
Dude, internet high five!
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.8
you guys suuuck :mad:
|
| |
|
|
