Van Halen
Van Halen III


0.5

Review

by gunmaster USER (5 Reviews)
January 2nd, 2007 | 20 replies


Release Date: 1998 | Tracklist

Review Summary: Oh God.

Van Halen's eight-thousanth album, inappropriately titled Van Halen III, is a horrible album. Really. I'm serious. Pretty much every VH fan hates this album, and people who weren't originally fans of VH hate it even more. Why is it hated so badly? Gary Cherone. I know you're probably asking "WTF? Who's that?" Well, if you haven't heard this album, you may not know. I'm sure you know David Lee Roth. I'm sure you know Sammy Hagar. But you probably don't know this guy, because this guy sucks. You got that? Understood? Good, now time for a little history lesson on VH.

VH HISTORY

Van Halen formed in 1974. In 1978, they released their debut album, the self-titled Van Halen. Van Halen II, Women And Children First, Fair Warning, Diver Down, 1984 were released in the following years. But then, vocalist David Lee Roth got out of the band! They replaced him with Sammy Gaybar. Sammy wasn't bad though. But then, after releasing a slew of albums with titles that consist of numbers and letters5150, OU812 and losing a bunch of fans, Van Halen replaced him. Then comes in Gary Cherone.

END OF THE LITTLE POINTLESS HISTORY LESSON OF VH

Now for the review....

THE REVIEW


Neworld is the first track, and it's an instrumental song that's only about 2 minutes. Thank God it's so short. It's actually funny that this is so bad. Eddie's playing the accoustic guitar, and Mike Post is playing the piano. At least you don't hear Gary's voice. The track is still crap though. It's just so un-VanHalen-ish. Nothing you would expect from this band.

Without You is another turd track. It's a rock tune, but it certainly does not rock. Oh no. Not at all. Not a single bit. Unlike classic VH, this song is quite long for an opener. Yes, I'm calling this an opener. You shouldn't even count the real opener as an actual track. There's some drums at the beginning, followed by guitar, and then it all kicks right in with vocals by Satan himself, the epitome of trash, a man filthier than Balsac The Jaws Of Death of GWAR, the one and only, Gary Cherone. His vocals don't suit the band. They just don't mix in with the instruments being played. Yeah, there's some nice guitar-playing by Eddie, but that's about it for this song. Crap track.

One I Want is a shorter song than the previous, but not by much. It's a half-decent track, but it's nothing too great. It's trash, don't get me wrong, but it's not as sucktastic as Without You, which would fit in on a Limp Bizkit album, as for how suckabulous it is. Anywho, on with this little piece of poo. It's sort of a fast-paced song with some nice work on the guitar, but other than that, everything else is OMG SOOO LAME D00d. Did I mention I don't like Gary Cherone's vocals?

From Afar is, once again, shorter than the previous tune, and that's a good thing. Short tunes are a blessing on this album, and there are two short songs. By short, I mean less than 2 minutes. It's not a very good song. Nothing is. That's established. But what makes this song stand out from the others? Read this excerpt from another review for this album:

"The opening fades in, tricking us with quiet guitar work. And then Eddie bombards the listener with an awesome heavy, doomy, monster riff! This is quite a creepy tune. The lyrics hint of obsessive love or lust--almost as if Cherone is playing the part of a stalker!



Cherone most likely is playing the part of a stalker. a guy stalking a 16 year old girl who takes a shower every night st 8:00 PM. There's a bathroom window near the shower, so it's an invitation for pedophile Peeping Toms like Gary.

Ok, so maybe that's not what this crappy song is about, but it's cool to think that that's what it's about. Regardless, the song is still abysmal. But the "monster riff", as the writer of the above excerpt calls it, is pretty good. I'll admit that.

Dirty Water Dog is the fifth track. This track is also mentioned in the dictionary. Look up "crap", and it has several definitions, but one of the definitions is a list of songs, and this one is mentioned.

The above statement is false.

But seriously, this song sucks hard. The vocals are just horrible, and it....just sucks. Listen, and find out. I don't feel like talking about this song.

Once is where the songs get so long that they're boring. The track I'm talking about right now is 7 minutes and 40 seconds. That's too long for such a lame tune. Waaaaaaaaaaaaay too long. It's immensely boring. No laughs to be had here at how stupid it is. The song tries to be so serious, that it's no fun at all.

Fire In The Hole is shorter than the previous, so that's good. It's just your casual standard hard rock song, except it's not as good. Average riffs mostly, but there are some good riffs here. Not that great, but it's not as bad as the previous turd I spoke of. Now that was a crappy song. Not this though.

Josephina is a standard boring ballad with horrendous vocals and half-decent guitar-playing. It's sort of like an 80's hair metal ballad, but in another way, it's not. An intensely boring song. It may be 5 minutes, but it seems like it's about 20 minutes. Ok, maybe I'm exaggerating a bit, but it's a boring tune, and it's crap.

Year To The Day is a quiet 8 minute song that drags on forever. It is the worst song on the album. The bridge sucks, which is unusual, because bridges are usually decent. Anywho, listen to the song, and you'll know how much it sucks.

Primary is a short little track that's just an intro Ballot Or The Bullet, and it's nothing special, but compared to YTTD, it's Stairway To Heaven. BOTB is a very raw and gritty track, and it's a decent song. The worst thing about it is Cherone's voice. It sounds as if he was trying to compete with a dead cat's voice. And the dead cat got mad and decided to choke Gary.

How Many Say I is the final track on this boring, dull, and dragged-out album. It's a ballad with Eddie on vocals, and he can sing better than Gary! They should have just had him sing on the whole album. Okay song.

Well, that's it. That's the atrocious album. It gets a 0.5/5! I'm not being generous today!!!!


user ratings (404)
1.8
poor
other reviews of this album
kwill15 (2.5)
Numerous mistakes prevented VH3 from achieving its full potential....

Mankind_ (5)
...



Comments:Add a Comment 
Intransit
January 3rd 2007


2797 Comments


I dont like Van Halen at all, but I'd rate this album a 5 just to spite your review. It was really bad and you barely described anything aside from the occassional mention of an instrument and the fact that you hate the vocals. Oh and the lyrical breakdown. Whatever. Try again sometimes.

By the way, a .5 is really supposed to be given out to albums with no musical competancy like Kidz Bop or James Blunt that are really just that bad.

Intransit
January 3rd 2007


2797 Comments


[quote=iluvatar]The second part was an opinion. The first part of his post accurately described your review.[/quote]
this

Kaleid
January 3rd 2007


760 Comments


You went too in-depth, which was more than this album deserved. Still, very meticulous

John Paul Harrison
January 3rd 2007


1014 Comments


=(

oshi happens.

EDIT: To be fair though, it wasn’t a bad review, but it could have had a bit more detail. I mean, describing each track literally minute-by-minute isn’t really appropriate for this kind of basic-rock album.

Plus, the 0.5 rating is pretty extreme. You must defend this position with a water-tight case if you want to wield it’s awesome power.
This Message Edited On 01.02.07

JumpTheF**kUp
January 3rd 2007


2722 Comments


Thats mostly because the review wasn't written well. Plus it was extremely biased. Like Canyoneer said, only stuff with no musical competency deserve a 0.5 like K-Fed.
By the way, this:

Year To The Day is a quiet 8 minute song that drags on forever. It is the worst song on the album. The bridge sucks, which is unusual, because bridges are usually decent. Anywho, listen to the song, and you'll know how much it sucks.

is not a song description.

megadeth101
January 3rd 2007


865 Comments


posted by review
Oh God.


Nice

megadeth101
January 3rd 2007


865 Comments


Plus you can get sued for Sammy Gaybar.

El_Goodo
January 3rd 2007


1016 Comments


Van Halen is a terribly overrated band, they've got very few good songs.

Bfhurricane
January 3rd 2007


6283 Comments


boo

foreverendeared
January 3rd 2007


14720 Comments


haha it made me laugh.

i'm guessing that's all you were really going for there

Sepstrup
January 3rd 2007


1567 Comments


Like Canyoneer said, only stuff with no musical competency deserve a 0.5 like K-Fed.


You can't fault him for thinking this album only deserves 0,5. I for one wouldn't award points for musical competency if it's not used in the right way. I'm not talking about this album specifically because I haven't heard it, but I've heard the argument before about a skilled musician's album. If he thinks it sucks, a 0,5 is fair.This Message Edited On 01.03.07

Acey
January 3rd 2007


2578 Comments


bad review, (not that mine are any better), but a semi-decent album

The Jungler
January 3rd 2007


4826 Comments


This wasn't a 0/4 review, but it wasn't much better than that. Work on it, you could be good.
Van Halen really suck though, so I'm not complaining about the rating.

Oddsen
January 3rd 2007


1127 Comments


This album isn't that bad. The intro is kinda nice i think

John Paul Harrison
January 3rd 2007


1014 Comments


[quote=gunmaster]A review really should just tell what was good, what was bad, and a few details. A review should be 50% opinion and 50% detail, not 10% opinion and 90% detail. [/quote]

But the thing is, those statements are 100% your opinion and 0% fact. When we ask for detail, it means describing how the album sounds using more specific adjectives, versus "this song's crap. too long" I read the through the whole piece, and I only have a vague idea how this record sounds.


[quote=throughout the review]The track is still crap though. Without You is another turd track. it's not as sucktastic as Without You. this crappy song is about. it's a boring tune, and it's crap.[/quote]

You see how you didn't really address how the album sounds? You gave us your opinion, which is fine, but there's a soundoff feature you can use to do this. On this site we're on, reviews are generally expected to describe how an album sounds and feels, not just give a track-by-track opinion.

For example, good reviews usually use some form of the words "emotion", "feel", "lyrics", "theme", "concept", "tone", "mood" and "vibes"- or at least, address those in a major way. You only really did that a few times.

[quote=review]It sounds as if he was trying to compete with a dead cat's voice[/quote]

This is good. Doing things like this would help you write better and more descriptive pieces.

This assessment wasn't really worth of four negs, so I can sympathize, but as most of the better reviewers will advise you, reviews need to go beyond the "this sucks/this is okay" format and really dig deeper into an album for quality works.


freudianslipknot
January 3rd 2007


803 Comments


I have not heard this album, but when I read your review I laughed till I stopped and was glad I am not a VH fan.

Intransit
January 3rd 2007


2797 Comments


yes JPH. You pretty much nailed it.

megadeth101
January 3rd 2007


865 Comments


Ha the other review has a 5. 0.5 - 5

TheSonomaDude
December 1st 2014


9077 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

VH3 Reviews



1/5

2.5/5

5/5



Wow, great spectrum.

JohnXDoesn't
October 18th 2015


1395 Comments


posi'd for 'Gaybar"



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy