Album Rating: 4.5
my 4.5 for this is based on how i love about everything this album does, but i don't particularly have a strong connection to it. I don't care about the rating descriptors the site uses
|
| |
@flag There are tonnes of albums I consider perfect personally, but regardless wouldnt it make sense for the top rating to remain attached to verbiage that encourage using it sparingly?
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
"my 4.5 for this is based on how i love about everything this album does, but i don't particularly have a strong connection to it"
I was just about to say this exact thing
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
Potsy I understand what you're saying, yeah "classic" is not the best descriptor either, but honestly no idea what would be
|
| |
Do you have any “perfect” albums that you have a deep emotional attachment to that you wouldn’t consider “classic”
I have lots of those
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
i like sweet trip for specific musical reasons that i would only waste time articulating for better users and none of that has anything to do with “online nerdspheres” in which they’re still not even that popular. I also haven’t even figured out what type of enjoyment I’m capable of deriving from their music anymore so thank you for trying to leverage my fandom against me before ascertaining that, dick. but I do know that Roby could commit 1000 heinous crimes and still not have it in him to write something as dry and musically inept as Wandering Star
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
"I have lots of those"
I have, like, exclusively those
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
Car Seat Headrest's Teens of Denial and Twin Fantasy are nearly perfect to me and I have strong connections with both, but would not consider them classics
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
Party at Portishead thread
Who brought the chips
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
What Pots is saying and what he is doing seems contradictory, maybe that’s his point
I don’t bloody know anymore.
I’m pretty sure he has actively attempted diluting the importance of the 5s and why you just shouldn’t give a damn, which I was buying (almost), but now it seems like he actually cares. I’m confused. Fuck this timeline.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
Did not realize me bumping this album randomly today would turn into a discussion about rating descriptors
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
2.5 = not good but not bad
3 = good album
3.5 = quite good but not mind blowing
4 = amazing album, one of the best of the year probably, probably no glaring flaws
4.5 = one of my favourite albums ever
5 = one of my very favourite albums ever
very simple
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
I just 5 albums that have only good songs or at least like average out to a 4.5/5 or higher when I rate all the songs (I round UP of course)
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
"Did not realize me bumping this album randomly today would turn into a discussion about rating descriptors"
I've never heard it before but it's a 1
|
| |
“
What Pots is saying and what he is doing seems contradictory, maybe that’s his point
I don’t bloody know anymore.
I’m pretty sure he has actively attempted diluting the importance of the 5s and why you just shouldn’t give a damn, which I was buying (almost), but now it seems like he actually cares. I’m confused. Fuck this timeline.”
I just talked about all that on the last page
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
this is a frustrating 6.5 that could have been a 7.5-8 if they tried harder
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
if i really like an album, i ask myself "is there anything about this i would change?"
if the answer is no, it's a 5
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
Colton, go back to wanking off Animal Collective
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
YoYo you gotta listen to this
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
that's kinda crazy to me yoyo, there are so many albums that I wouldn't change anything about but they're still 3.5s or 4s. it's like lasagna. the best lasagna in the world will still only be a 7/10 max, there's nothing that can be done to it to improve it without making it into something different than lasagna entirely
|
| |
|
|
