Album Rating: 1.5

STTEEEAAAKKKK



hi friend

Album Rating: 3.5

TIL if it's simple it's buttrock.

surprisebuttrock

Album Rating: 2.0

No it's buttrock because it sounds like generic radio rock bullshit lol

Album Rating: 3.5

Honestly how do you even make a song like Rapture in the same style NOT "butt rock"? Seems like simplistic structures are bound to get slapped with that.

Album Rating: 2.0

Simple, you don't write a shitty song like Rapture

Album Rating: 3.5

Like it's almost impossible to simplify without running roughshot into the "butt rock" pool.

Album Rating: 3.5

So is it stylistically doomed to fail?

Simple doesn't necessarily mean bad, ya know

Album Rating: 2.0

Yeah because it's not interesting sounding. Underoath needs to write good music again.

I humbly disagree there. Simple music can be good if the songwriting's there.

Album Rating: 2.0

TOCS is fairly simplistic and that album rules

Album Rating: 3.5

I'm still getting from this discourse here that the style itself can't be saved no matter what.

Album Rating: 3.5

TOCS was simple but they were still inaccessible for the average audience due to the heaviness that still existed.

Album Rating: 2.0

You can be accessible and still write good music. Underoath failed to do that here.

You can be accessible and still write good music [2]

Album Rating: 1.5

[3]

Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off

CALM HI FREN :]]]]]]]

Album Rating: 3.5

Is it stylistically doomed to fail, or is there potential there that Underoath failed to tap into? That's the question I'm trying to pose, seems like you think its the former lol.

Album Rating: 1.5

Underoath just wrote a bad album, simple as that