Linkin Park The Hunting Party
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
rodrigo90
May 18th 2017


7387 Comments


Best comparison to the new LP album EVER.

Although raditude's cover is as silly as fuck.

One more light cover is like something pink floyd would use.

onionbubs
May 18th 2017


23796 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

raditude is a better album tbh. at least in places it's kinda funny bad plus pull me back together and love is the answer are better than all of oml

rodrigo90
May 18th 2017


7387 Comments


Even Rush counterparts cover is a work of art in comparison to weezer's.

onionbubs
May 18th 2017


23796 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

fuck even the cure's s/t has a better cover than raditude

rodrigo90
May 18th 2017


7387 Comments


LOL

rodrigo90
May 18th 2017


7387 Comments


Good point.

TVC15
May 18th 2017


11384 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Rekt

rodrigo90
May 18th 2017


7387 Comments


I can't wait for the review of the album on friday and all the users throwing shit to the album and the band, it's going to be awesome!!!!!!

One of my favourite passtimes in this site.

sempiturtle
May 18th 2017


1685 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Lol what's your problem dude

TVC15
May 18th 2017


11384 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

It's Verm... His only problem Linkin Park is derping hard while he's djenting

neekafat
Emeritus
May 18th 2017


26926 Comments

Album Rating: 3.8

"Is going to get a lot of shit and sadly in this case is well deserved, and that's coming from the most militant and angriest linkin park fanboy of this website."

[2]

sempiturtle
May 18th 2017


1685 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Sorry I can't keep up with the endless Verm alts lmao

Beardog
May 18th 2017


6514 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

I like the tracks were Mike does the vocals, but overall it's pretty bad. Wished they would just use 'real' instruments on OML, I think i would've liked it a lot more if they did. I also hate how every song has the same structure and the chorus get's repeated 4+ times in a song....

Valkoor952
May 18th 2017


4896 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

It's scary but I think they genuinely like their new album which is mind-numbing to me.

ashcrash9
Emeritus
May 18th 2017


3492 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

dude they've always been totally un-self-aware to what everyone is doing, that's one of the reasons they keep dipping their toes in shit like OML



this whole decade their musical approach has been defined by uninformed blanket statements of "this sound is better than this sound," and as evidenced from LT to this to OML, there's no consistency to what they're thinking whatsoever. Reading interviews and shit, it's like they're so fixated on NOT churning out something they dislike instead of actually crafting something they do



whatever, band hit its peak with ATS, they clearly don't have the will to experiment or take an open-minded approach to music again so I dunno what I'm expecting

AsleepInTheBack
Emeritus
May 18th 2017


10745 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

watched an interesting interview with Mike where, yeah, he basically said 'we do what makes us happy, we hate staying in one place, and we get frustrated when people dislike our changes in sound and just say do HT again'; kind of missing the point that most people are fine with them changing their sound but somewhat less fine when they make a shit album because (as ash said) they don't pay attention to what anyone is doing and don't seem to realise that their 'experiments' are often not that experimental at all

TVC15
May 18th 2017


11384 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

@Beardog The band did use real instruments on the album. The drums sound completely real other than some slight filtering, Phoenix's bass is pretty audible, and Brad is obviously the dude playing guitar

ashcrash9
Emeritus
May 18th 2017


3492 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

exactly, Asleep



and it's even more frustrating because you can tell they're "experimenting" without really /listening/ to anything new or taking inspiration from different places. Even though they're sonically "trying something new," they're taking their cues from the same ideas and structures they have almost nonstop since they started. For an album or two, that could work, but when you take that approach for this long, it starts to wear incredibly thin, regardless of how you express it. Fans catch onto that and see it as a lack of inspiration or passion, so no matter how much LP themselves are like "we're really proud of this, we really feel it," something's wrong if that's not being conveyed.

Valkoor952
May 19th 2017


4896 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

@Asleep

If someone can get that exact thing into their heads, it would be nice.

They really are oblivious to the fact that most people don't like this new stuff not because it's not HT 3.0 or Meteora 2.0, but because in itself it's a pile of shit irregardless of the genre.

Beardog
May 19th 2017


6514 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

@TVC, I do like the fact that there is atleast some real guitar, but on songs like Good Goodbye there isn't any real bass. Even on the songs where there is, it isn't brought forward in the mix, it could be every instrument on 0-200 hz. Drumwise, the record does have some parts where there indeed is a real kit playing, but this is only some parts. Most parts are 808 beats, not a filtered drum kit. I'd rather see them use the drumsound they did on Living Things than this real-notreal drum change up...



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy