Album Rating: 2.5
by that standard, get used to disappointment
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
Potatoes don't have ears, makes sense they would have this rated weirdly.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
I was going to rate this lower than Low Teens, but the ways in which the band deviate from their usual style and do so extremely well make this album an equivalent success in my mind.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5 | Sound Off
"by that standard, get used to disappointment"
Don t pretend not liking good stuff you re not into with high standards. Dudes that 5 half dozen albums hide before this idea of standards. I m sure its makes them feel important. Band practically invented their subgenre and are still unmatched release upon release.
|
| |
FPU best ETID [18047]
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5 | Sound Off
And all of sudden you re dead!
|
| |
shame ledd for having better taste than just about anyone itt one more time and i'll wipe my arse with your own p-p-pretence of personal standards and see if they get caught in the pleb filter in my u-bend
atrocious scenes i am shocked
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5 | Sound Off
Too many 2-2.5s means you re doing something wrong with your free time. Idc what the objectivity stands for on this website (or any other tbh), since we pick the music we listen insted of albums being randomly assigned to us (if it was the case thr objecttivity calc would make sense)
|
| |
because choosing to listen to an album famously counts as a guarantee that it's going to be any good
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5 | Sound Off
Not at all..just make sure you re just not wasting time, and just don t act superior, cause sput is made of both
|
| |
idk wasting time is when you pour hours into records like these on the off-chance that the zillion people you disagree with are right and they are in fact growers
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5 | Sound Off
Eh I have not mentioned the rate but the rating system, which it can be whatever you want. Its just that the standards argument is annoying af
|
| |
its just not working for me.... maybe some day??
|
| |
"just that the standards argument is annoying af"
this literally comes down to i dont lyk other peoples opninonzz and i no longer have the energy to meme it
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5 | Sound Off
Nah its the pretentious "I am above sput" attitude. Of course they are opinions but that s more than cleared out by this point, so yeah wise not to waste energy.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
would one rather be above or below sput
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
"Dudes that 5 half dozen albums hide before this idea of standards."
5.0 is a masterpiece rating. A magnum opus. The highest normal score should be 4.5 (where album is already perfect), 5.0 is a notch above that. I do not think a band should have more than one 5.0 either for that exact reason. (Yes I know I gave Bach two 5.0 scores. I'm still at conflict with myself for that.)
"Too many 2-2.5s means you re doing something wrong with your free time."
Yeah at below 2.5 usually I give up and do a sub 2.5 rating before I'm finished with the album.
"Nah its the pretentious "I am above sput" attitude."
You mean, like how you're doing when someone on sput doesn't rate this album 5.0 like you?
|
| |
bach was a really good band agreed
|
| |
everything's a five and each notch lower than that you rank is you reporting errors within yrself
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off
It's nice to see the band is playing about 7 songs from this album live. And one of them is Sly... Love that track!!
|
| |
|
|