Album Rating: 4.0
Yea I kinda dislike the "classic" tag for 5s
|
| |
why do you say that here?
|
| |
5 just means it's better than a 4.5 sheesh
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
Gotta have ya classics though.
|
| |
What makes this album a classic?
It's awesome, but it's not anywhere close to flawless.
don't be stupid please
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
@Slut Why? Because someone mentioned it above dude.
|
| |
didn't read that whoops.
i disagree. i think classic works cause it could be a sub and obj classic depends on the person and how they view it. it could have flaws and whateever but it's how the person views it
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
It's all dependent on what you want your music to deliver.
Should you want an unrelenting, original, uncompromising, dark, visceral slice of guitar rock this delivers hard and is a classic of the kind.
|
| |
if it has flaws you don't 5 it smh
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
Flaws can still provide feels
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
feels aren't flawless
|
| |
yeah. i mean you could argue if a 'flawless album' exists i think. but as i said i think it really depends on the person. some of the albums i think are 5's aren't perfect but they're still classics to me, and others anyway
|
| |
i think that a flawless album is something in its self that can be debated
|
| |
you got these sentences available in intelligible?
|
| |
No sorry :[
|
| |
Not real techno.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
DSOTM is flawless, but I can definitely see why people think it's turd.
I did myself for years.
|
| |
how was Dark Side a turd to you?
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
Just an outdated wankathon that didn't connect in the slightest when I was young........and foolish
|
| |
did some extensive thinking on the topic and have to agree
the classic tag is complete shit
|
| |
|
|
