Album Rating: 4.5
Devil Hold Tis Pole
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
*uncontrolled bursts of rage*
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
You won't like me when I'm angry.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
It would be so much more fun if I actually took you seriously, Potato.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
This = wordvomit
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
you gave this a 3 and you say it sucks
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
Potato = rebel.
|
| |
3= awful
4= okay
4.5-5= actually like it
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
I can get behind that rating system
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
yeah, pretty much how I rate albums.
so if a three can still suck dick... is this worth checking out?
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
3 - Good
but can still suck dick.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Well this could have been great, like this band has tons of potential but this album doesn't have a good sense of direction. I'm not just talking about the worthless 25 minutes of ambience but the songs don't do much to really grab me, they need to improve on the songwriting.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
The ambiance is perfectly fine.
|
| |
lol objective
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Okay
Ascending: 8 minutes of noise, then glances 2 more minutes of noise, in Marasm the few minutes of ambience before the song builds works. Infinite Sunset, another track dedicated to the same noise we heard in Ascending and Glances. All the noise is the same so that's even worse, it's repetitive noise and it's digital keyboard patches.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
http://tigerbeatdown.com/2011/12/30/the-ten-objectively-best-songs-of-2011/
|
| |
I don't get how people think there is objectivity in music
|
| |
nope
|
| |
they're not my favourite band
explain to me music objectivity
|
| |
I keep meaning to lower this to 3.5 but do try and explain
|
| |
|
|
