Album Rating: 4.5
looool @ the 0% metallum review. dude actually spends three paragraphs calling this "stolen" and unoriginal without any insight or original thoughts on the music.
"I’m sure a lot of the hype around this record is due to its specific aesthetics appealing to a younger audience or people unfamiliar with the originals."
ok boomer
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
@Sevengill Just came from that review loling haha!
|
| |
Dude gave it 0%? C'mon man
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
That's why we avoid that website
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Gottem
|
| |
metal archives sucks tbh
|
| |
I actually probably use it more than Sput lol
|
| |
as a database its fine but the community is cringe imo
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
That's kinda what I've gotten from it as well. The database can actually be useful at times for release dates, lineups etc but the community seems pretty cringey/toxic
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
Can confirm the community is extremely shitty. I got banned from the forum for saying that I liked Louis CK's comedy and a mod immediately banned me and said that I promote rape lol.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Bookmarked
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
Hey yall check WHARFLURCH
Edit: right Combustion?
|
| |
"Hey yall check WHARFLURCH"
Which Dr. Seuss book is that from?
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
"...WHARFLURCH"
How does it compare to this? I have so many albums in my go to list that I have to filter so if you assure me it's as good as this one I might be interested.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
Just set one after the other. You should do fine. Even if this is better, hence the 4.5, it doesn t mean its less fun
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Wharflurch is pretty sweet yeah
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
this album is gooey
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
i keep listening to this. tracks 2 through 4 are so sick
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
tracks 2 through 4 are so sick [2]
Solid LP
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
i'm three for three with pre-ordering a 20bs album on vinyl and it looking like absolute dogshit when it comes in
|
| |
|
|
