Album Rating: 3.0
lol this is like twice as long as whenever if ever
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
more like 20 minutes longer but close enough
even so 50 minutes for an album is pretty normal tbh
|
| |
Well I will give it a few more plays to see if it grows on me. Last time I saw them live it was pretty fun. Nevertheless I am glad to see people enjoying the band.
|
| |
A poppy-ish Emo album can get a little grating at longer lengths, but I think has sufficient variation.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0 | Sound Off
after a couple of full listens i literally remember the first song from this. incredibly forgettable LP for me
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
Also album is not too long at all. It's pacing is fucking perfect.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
not enough people are talking about Mount Hum, song is just such a great closer.
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
ok, talk. what are your thoughts on it
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
one of the best closers of the year imo
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
what do you like about it?
|
| |
It is a Mount. That Hums.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
reminds me of sleepmakeswaves, definitely a point where the post rock influence is at its strongest
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
we need more skulls is probably my fave on here
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Is it just me or does some of the material remind you of some Fleet Foxes? Also, this is sitting around a 4 or 4.5 for me - been returning to it a lot.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
Considering the majesty of You Can't live here Forever - The album is disappointing as a whole for me
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Album is good, but here are my thoughts in comparing W,IF and Harmlessness.:
As a package, I prefer Whenever, If Ever. Something about that record just begs to be listened to front to back. Some of the songs lose impact as individual tracks and are not as fleshed out as Harmlessness, but as an album it was nearly perfect from the very first listen.
Harmlessness probably has better individual songs. There is maturity in the songwriting (which can be a positive or negative depending on how much you liked the raw aspect in some of the songs on the previous album) and there is a lot of variety here, yet everything still fits on the same record. It's good. But it lacks that special something that makes me want to listen front to back and instead I already tend to be in the mood for just certain songs. It's really good, but just lacks this unique cohesiveness that I feel the previous had.
|
| |
This sounds more like Owl City than emo revival to me
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0 | Sound Off
@JamieCTA
four out of five even though it isn't a cohesive album?
reads more like 3/3.5 to me
|
| |
Comparing an album to Owl City while giving it a positive rating. I see your bullshit.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
damn that owl city comparison came out of nowhere
|
| |
|
|
