Album Rating: 3.5
Go Clayman next. Their only dud record (apart from Luna Strain) was Colony.
|
| |
Yeah, I probably would go for Clayman actually, because Only For The Weak is an enjoyable song
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
Are you f******* serious?This Message Edited On 01.06.09
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
how was colony a dud, or lunar strain?
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
clayman is pretty much like boring as shit
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
*shrug* Colony just bores me. And the vocals on Lunar Strain are hidious (and yes, I know who they're by).
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
Hahaha I was going to get to that. I can see why you dont like LS, I'm picky about vocals but dont mind that album so much
|
| |
Why is this only 4.2? i will never know this is the best album ever!
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
I guess it's just me but I prefer Colony to this.
|
| |
Its not just you but i feel that album has nothing on this
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
care to elaborate?
|
| |
care to ejaculate?
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
...
done, now I want a response!
|
| |
i like Whoracle best because it's awesomely consistent.
but this is a close second.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
I can never choose between the 2, but Whoracle does have some of the weaker tracks like Morphing Into Primal and the title track
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
Wtf they both rule.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
yeah but compared to the rest of the album they seem like filler
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
filler is now = awesomeness, what the hell
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
Nah Everything Counts is filler.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
I dont know, MIP is just kinda there, nothing really grabs my attention about it. And Whoracle just repeats the same riff.
|
| |
|
|
