Album Rating: 2.5

Yeah, band has been stagnant as fuck



And I agree with dungeonboy. Liiva fitted alright and he was quite good on BBeven if he wasn't the most capable vocalist.

Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off

Liiva's vocals on Stigmata and Burning Bridges is actually pretty fantastic. Musically this album seemed like a throwback to that era in some ways. I think it gets a bit more flak than deserved.

Album Rating: 3.5

Wow a 1.5 rating? Seriously why so fucking over critical?

Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off

Because this cookiecutter nonsense deserves no defending. It's all just copypasted from their past albums.

Album Rating: 3.0

By-the-numbers album, really, and they've been trending towards this for ages, mightn't bother with them in future

Album Rating: 2.5

Too formulaic yes, especially compared to their first three.

negative confirmation

Album Rating: 2.5

So is this bad?

It's more stale than bad.

its neither here nor there, but it pales in comparison to their older material imo

Album Rating: 2.5

As The Pages Burn is a killer track tho

Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off

agreed. i like this album

Album Rating: 3.3

Yeah it's really good.

Album Rating: 3.5

Loved it, but I have just started listening to them when Alissa joined... So that might be why I don't find it bad for being stale.

Album Rating: 1.5

"Wow a 1.5 rating? Seriously why so fucking over critical?"



Because I think the album's awful?

I actually checked this out and it's pretty good haha.

Album Rating: 3.0

album's aight tbh, better than the last few Arch Enemy albums but I still wish Alissa had stayed with The Agonist so they'd keep putting out albums like Prisoners and not shit like Five

listened again today and this still rules i don't know what the fuck y'all problem is

Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off

it's cookie-cutter super generic, doesn't take advantage of new members' abilities at all, is just more of the same Michael Amott Show.

Album Rating: 1.5

It's boring as fuck