TesseracT Altered State
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
intotheshit
May 29th 2013


3637 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

And I urge you to jump off of a building.

ProtossTheHero
May 29th 2013


167 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

I'm just giving a suggestion. If you assume all of it's the same, you'd just be flat out wrong.

MO
May 29th 2013


24239 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5 | Sound Off

"Novallo in particular is anything but boring."



lol are you serious. ooo they throw in a few badly placed synths.. so not boring!



they are a typical example of how fucking oversaturated to shit djent has (very)quickly become

ProtossTheHero
May 29th 2013


167 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

They incorporate a variety of styles into their music, its more than just synths. Vocals aren't generic yelling, bass and drums are both used for more than rhythm. I'd say its pretty interesting.

Motiv3
May 29th 2013


9351 Comments


Skyharbor are good, Erra and Vildhjarta are boring as hell though. Haven't heard the other two.

MO
May 29th 2013


24239 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5 | Sound Off

^ true dat, but at least vildhjarta sound fairly sinister



all these cookie cutter djent bands are sounding more and more girly with every iteration!

ProtossTheHero
May 29th 2013


167 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

What about Corelia? They seem to be pretty well-received on Sputnik.

zuzek
May 29th 2013


949 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Now while I think genre labeling is futility within futility within futility, Corelia is hardly in any possible way djenty.



Check out Means End, especially Nox Aurumque.

NonApplicable
May 29th 2013


3028 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

You always see the same names pop up in reviews of albums in this style dishing out 1's and 1.5's saying the shit's boring. They're boring.



This, hard.

_



I'm in love with TesseracT but not because they are "Djent". I pretty much dislike all djent bands because they're plagued with patchy songwritting(except meshuggah of course).



Monuments had promise, but they f***ed it up with their vocalist IMO.

KILL
May 29th 2013


81582 Comments


u suk

NonApplicable
May 29th 2013


3028 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

LoL. KILL even though you love your 1/5s, you're basically in you're own category. KILL does what he

wants.

ProtossTheHero
May 30th 2013


167 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Isn't Monuments out to get a new vocalist?

NonApplicable
May 30th 2013


3028 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

Yeah. If the new one is any good, I hope they re-do vocals on the debut.

FearThyEvil
May 30th 2013


19391 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

Wow, you really suck. Do you often devolve into child like behavior?



I never said you can't dislike an album. I understand why people dislike this, and it's all fair criticism. There is a difference between writing "good songs" and writing unlistenable music. Leave it to you to miss the entire point and go off on some brainless tangent.



Your argument before was saying that just because they have talent a 2 or higher is in order which is a completely idiotic statement. If you have talent but the songwriting, catchy-ness, or overall pull to attract the listener than the album can warrant the opinion of anything from a 1-5. Get over the fact that something you 4.5 isn't going to be treated well by ever user.

Drummerboy123
May 30th 2013


3135 Comments


"I like this album album a lot.

Other's don't.

That's cool."

An example of how users should, but never will act on this site.

climactic
May 31st 2013


22911 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

usually when a band has technical skill they can write at least some fairly interesting music. i hate rings of saturn but i just can't give em in the same rating as emmure or brokencyde, despite how stupid their songs are

Archael
May 31st 2013


1163 Comments


lots of butthurt itt.

FearThyEvil
May 31st 2013


19391 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

Climactic is your avatar Daenery's from Game of Thrones. I just started season 1 yesterday and I'm loving it.

Cygnatti
May 31st 2013


36392 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

Your argument before was saying that just because they have talent a 2 or higher is in order which is a completely idiotic statement. If you have talent but the songwriting, catchy-ness, or overall pull to attract the listener than the album can warrant the opinion of anything from a 1-5. Get over the fact that something you 4.5 isn't going to be treated well by ever user.
hit the nail on the head. vice versa is also true (referring to talent and how "good" music/album is) as the Ramones don't exactly have a lot of talent, yet I can still safely give a high score to their albums considering influence, personal enjoyment, etc.

climactic
May 31st 2013


22911 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

yeah thats her, best show ever. wait till you get to season 2, shit gets REAL



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy