Album Rating: 4.0
Delivering an intricately mathy approach to pop-punk, Oregon-based outfit Icarus The Owl continue to amaze on their 2nd LP 'Love Always, Leviathan'. With finger-tapping quirky time signatures around every corner, the band definitely won't be for everyone due to the complexity of some of the song structures. If anything though, the quartet are more focused here, meaning this is still a relatively accessible album, even if it doesn't quite match the peaks of their debut. Either way, it's difficult to disagree that these are 4 technically skilled musicians. Recommended Tracks: What We Had Was Never Love, Nuclear Towns, Love Always Leviathan & Tear Down the Mountain.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
I just got their debut a little while back, but I still need to give it an honest listen. It didn't quite reel me in like this one did. I was very surprised by the post hardcore tinge that came with it though.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
honestly my favorite thing about the drummer is how he turns odd time signatures into really solid grooves.
What We Had Was Never Love's chorus is in 11/8 and the groove is still really tight. props.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
11/8? Fuck, that's hard to count out, lol. Most of their time signature changes are pretty smooth with the transitions though, so that's even more impressive.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
11/16* my bad, it's 3/4 minus one 16th note haha, it feels really weird
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Yeah, I was trying to count it out and I kept getting lost. Really complex time signatures like that throw me off. I can handle the basics, 4/4, 3/4, 6/8. etc, even stuff like 5/4 isn't too terrible. I think the hardest ones I've ever tried to mess with are 12/8 and 9/8. Those took a few times to get used to.
I'd love to watch these guys play live, I bet that would be awesome.
|
| |
doesn't sound like pop punk to me. why does this get that label? ._.
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
Are you with me to come undone?
The first one of us is dust!
it's got dem pop punk vocals
|
| |
The melodies, man... Those melodies.
Label it whatever you want though. =]
|
| |
never mind... got through the whole album now.
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
the vocals get tiring sometimes
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
yeah they can
the whole act gets stale at times
|
| |
My only gripe with the vocals is that his range is very limited here. If he employed more variety in the tracks, they would be even better.
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
I can work with low range (I have extremely low range too)
but there needs to be more variety in the way he sings sometimes. some more slower parts would have
been preferable.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
By the way, I think 2 or even 3 of the band members changed between albums... I stand to be corrected though. Lead singer(/guitarist) obviously stayed.
|
| |
God the guitars are absolutely phenomenal on this. I wish it had junz ):
|
| |
Haha. I wish the vocalist was more diverse, but the album's still stellar so I dun even curr.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
I don't have a problem with the vocals, I think he sounds great. I think the guitar parts get a little repetitive (while still being technical and awesome sounding) here and there. The lead parts feel overly similar at times and is the reason I had trouble differentiating between some of the songs the first couple times I listened to it.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
i'm still listening to this album all the time and liking it even more. bumping this back up to a 4.5. so freaking good
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
I was giving it a rest, but I just started listening to it again. Still kicks ass, just as much as it did before.
|
| |
|