Legit Sum 41 fan til death!! just had to laugh at this review... well if you can call it that.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
Don't make yourselves look silly....
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
"I love it how these fanboys always ran out of arguments (if they had any good ones in the first place, that is) and then bring up something totally irrelevant to rant about, through what they vaguely try to justify their view on the matter at hand, which really makes no sense to be honest."
Well actually the haters are the ones with no points to argue, the people that don't mind Sum 41 made some good points for a while whereas the haters just abused them rather than defending the reviewers view.
He says this album ripped off other people which it didn't. It is the most original of any of their albums, with no notable elements of any other bands used, which really if he hates that they steal from others, he should like this album more so than all the others.
No idea how SBM relates to Foo Fighter's Pretender either, he his explanation makes no sense and listening to both songs they are nothing alike in composition other than using soft and loud parts, which is hardly a ripping.
Fact is your review had nothing to back up the ridiculously low score other than your hate for the band ripping Green Day in UH, and that they hadn't been original before. Honestly it seems like you didn't even listen to the album in whole, or more than once, so your opinion really doesn't have any subtstance or sense in it.
Sentences such as 'The new Sum 41 album sucks' leave me thinking it's a 12 year-old hater that wrote this, and your points following just affirm that point.
You say Time For You To Go and Baby You Don't Wanna Know are "awful lazy songs" without saying why or how, and you neglect to point out that they don't fit in with the theme of the album very and this is probably why they don't fit.
Overall it was just a very poorly written review. If you took the time to research and make points that actually made sense, you could of have the possibly of defending your low score. Don't compare songs to other songs when they sound nothing alike, and aren't even similar in composition.
|
| |
lmao
|
| |
Tyler1942
One of the few who actually talks any sense on this thread. Thank you.
|
| |
Legit!!!!!!!!
|
| |
i tried to be perfect.
but nothing was worth it.
|
| |
I thought it'd be easy
but no one believes me.
I meant all the things I said.
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
Negative reviews of bad albums by average bands: giving 13 year old kids the courage to speak out behind the safe curtain of the internet since...well, the internet.
|
| |
I mean, i agree with the crit that knott gave me and can see what irving was saying in regards to the review but...
man i wish i knew about this site when i was 13
|
| |
these guys absolutely have to be trolls. there is honestly no other explanation I can come up with at this point.
like, they can't even grasp an idea as simple as "opinions"
I mean:
well if 2500 people realize that 2+2=4 but only one guy doesn't then he is just wrong
and
best punk band in the world and that is fact.
.....what the actual fuck
these guys are either butthurt members of the band, incredibly talented trolls, or the biggest idiots to have ever graced a sputnik thread. eat your heart out, MJ
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
knott and irving critiques? i must have missed that...
i will have to actually hear this before i condemn you; but chances are i'll agree
|
| |
Oh my god what are all these creatures coming out the fucking woodwork
|
| |
knott and irving critiques? i must have missed that...
mmhmm, check the earlier pages of the thread, sowing
|
| |
I fucking loved All Killer No Filler and Chuck was pretty good, but I haven't really paid attention to this band for a while and I couldn't care less about hearing this.
The real pull here is the awesome thread though.
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
There was a time when I actually REALLY loved Chuck, but this band just doesn't have any appeal to me anymore. Too much other good music to digest.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
Aids u as blind as jared and see only what u wanna see.
ive said "decent album of one of the best punk band" but u both repeating only half of these words only trying to have a point for critic
|
| |
exactly. this was one of those bands that was like a stepping stone for me into different types of
music, like punk. I'll always have a soft-spot for the band but all the singles of theirs that I've
heard in the past 3 or so years have been really bland. to be honest, I stopped caring when they lost
brownsound. I loves me some brownsound.
(edit @ sowing)
|
| |
ive said "decent album of one of the best punk band" but u both repeating only half of these words only trying to have a point for critic
as you wish
"decent album of one of the best punk band"
this is opinion
this is not fact
|
| |
"Aids u as blind as jared and see only what u wanna see.
ive said "decent album of one of the best punk band" but u both repeating only half of these words only trying to have a point for critic "
I'm not going to repeat everything you said, that would be pointlessd. I was just pointing out some really really really really really stupid things that you (or someone else) said.
seriously, opinion =/= fact. when you get that through your thick skull then report back here and we can continue.
|
| |
|
|