Opeth Damnation
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
Poet
March 19th 2011


6146 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Guys should really know that English isn't his first language. Just saying

Emim
March 19th 2011


35535 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

This was kinda a pissy way to go out.



I can see some of the newer users not knowing who he is, but anyone that has done ANY reading of old reviews has come across him at least 30 times.

Shredzilla
March 19th 2011


502 Comments


Good riddance to this fucktard! If this review is anything like the hundreds of other reviews he's shit out, then its worthy of a big fat thumbs down.

Shredzilla
March 19th 2011


502 Comments


"It's not just about whether its well written or not... Seriously think about that for a minute. I could write a review that flows well enough but goes nowhere, does that mean I deserve a pos vote?"

I'm still wondering how in the hell this is even considered well written! He uses so many grammatical mistakes in the first paragraph that he makes kindergartners look like friggin college grads.

Crimson Death
March 19th 2011


533 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5 | Sound Off

"i just re-read it, it has several typos here and there, but overall is a well written ranting review.



It's just my opinion, though."



Are you serious? This review sounds like it was written by a troll. He is either messing around, or perhaps he has undergone some recent personal/psychological issues and this is some strange form of stress release . A farewell message? Come on, Internet life can't be THAT dramatic. (Unless he has angry Opeth fans following him around in back alleys now.)

Voivod
Staff Reviewer
March 19th 2011


10781 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

all i wrote is that it was a well written !!!!!!!!RANTING!!!!!!!! review.



For that reason ONLY, i pos'd.







botb
March 19th 2011


18000 Comments


NO DISTORTION?!

FUX DIS


z

KILL
March 19th 2011


81580 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

agreed

Immortallix
March 19th 2011


77 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

This review is full of ignorance to real music.

Idnuf
March 19th 2011


1490 Comments


Revoo sux w/ all oter ov his revoos

Am I cool now?

(But this review does indeed suck asshole)

Voivod
Staff Reviewer
March 19th 2011


10781 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

@ Idnuf



superb avatar man! :-)



STOP SHOUTING!
March 19th 2011


791 Comments


dethrasher you're a legend your reviews will live on in sputnik long after the hipsters have moved on long live metal this review is fantastic deth don't go don't ever go i love you.

zaruyache
March 19th 2011


27493 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

One less black knight fighting for all that is thrashy. RIP Dethtrasher.

Slum
March 19th 2011


2580 Comments


if u dont know a user on a free music website ur fuckin gay dude go die thrash metal metal

Gigglesdemon
March 19th 2011


187 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Damn. Deth was a great reviewer. I'm sorry to see him go. While I can see some people not liking this review, I feel a lot of you complaining are just butthurt Opeth fanboys. So he doesn't like your favorite band? GET THE FUCK OVER IT! Music is subjective, some people enjoy Miley Cyrus. Others don't. Don't get pissy if someone doesn't like what you like. I feel like he adequately showed why he didn't like the album, so it's not like he's bashing it. Anyways, R.I.P. Deth!

tiesthatbind
March 19th 2011


7441 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

It doesn't matter if he's from another country. After 5 years and 232 reviews, a review with grammar this bad is laughable.

Photon
March 19th 2011


1308 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

haha

toxin.
March 19th 2011


13036 Comments


I love contrarian (is that even a word?) review, but it was pretty badly written.
And while I find it ironic that people criticize the "it's not metal so it sucks" approach of the review, that is basically what it is.

Lambda
March 19th 2011


2654 Comments


Yeah the grammar is terrible. Plus, if you just solely base your pos/neg on whether or not it was well-written, I could, by that logic, write a very well written review of the toilet I just took a dump in, post it as a review for this album, and you would pos it since it was well-written. Imo, you have to do more than just write well (which this review didn't do anyway) to get a pos.

toxin.
March 19th 2011


13036 Comments


This got like 18 pos's and 34 negs right?
That, I think, is a problem though. Had the album had the same terrible grammatical issues but praised the album, I bet the ratio would be closer to 3 pos: 1 neg instead of the 1:2 it is right now.

Like yeah, the grammar does suck, but there have been worse ones that got a better pos:neg ratio.

I think (as some people said before) some butthurt Opeth fans have a problem with one person calling the album a 1.5, and the reviewer did them a service by giving them a legitimate reason to neg it (even though that isn't inherently the reason why they neg'd it).



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy