dave muskrat would kick yours and lars's ass
edited for editing purposesThis Message Edited On 01.27.09
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
dave muskat would kick yours and lars's ***
lars wouldn't know where his ass was, he certainly doesn't seemto know where his drums are.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
...>_>
PROFILE.
WTF are you trying to say.
|
| |
he likes metalcore is all i got out of that
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
You know, your profile, it has your musical taste on it...
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
metalcore sucks.
|
| |
Quote:
oh right k his opinion is wrong - bad review negnegneg
/sigh
You're an idiot, aren't you...
well no, actually i'm not
i'm a pretty egotistical kid and have no qualms admitting the fact that i am pretty damn clever, almost definitely a hell of a lot more intelligent than you at any rate
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
"he likes metalcore is all i got out of that"
Oh come on, only 8%...
|
| |
pretty much
|
| |
omg every1 is commentin too fast wtf
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
i'm a pretty egotistical kid and have no qualms admitting the fact that i am pretty damn
clever, almost definitely a hell of a lot more intelligent than you at any rate
And if you ignore the rest, you won't have to bend that incredible brain around the task of
actually posing an argument that isn't completely retarded.
Genius strategy 101!This Message Edited On 01.27.09
|
| |
joinin' the comment stream
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
[quote="HighandDriving"]It was well written but that doesn't mean that it's not a poor review.[/quote]
[quote="Psychotruck"] Technically, the neg/pos system is based around whether or not the review was well written, so negging a well written review, despite it being poor is retarded. ...that's like saying that if someone can make a good case for holocaust denial, it means that they shouldn't be mocked... I'd say that no matter how eloquent the holocaust denier is, he's still talking bullshit, even if it's eloquent and structured bullshit. Which is what this review is. Slightly well-written bullshit.[/quote]
LMAO, what a couple of retards. From the "Sputnikmusic FAQ, Reviewing Guide, and Other Important Stuff" thread in the forums:
"For non-staff reviews, users are given the opportunity to give instant feedback on reviews by deciding "Yes" or "No" in terms of how well-written a review was. Note that the question is "Was this review well-written?" and NOT "Do you agree with the opinion of this reviewer?""
So, Psychotruck, yes, it does mean exactly that. If someone proposes a good argument for denying the holocaust, it is a good argument, regardless of whether or not you agree with it. As for HighandDriving, you're obviously just another troll who got his panties in a bunch because he got out-trolled by a review that wasn't even intended as a troll in the first place. You're both mental deficients.
|
| |
you're taking everything too srsly plus your argument is ridiculous just saying
EDIT: at psychotruck
good to see hyperbore realises how retarded their arguments are as wellThis Message Edited On 01.27.09
|
| |
I've never seen the site so active since mynameisfryingpan
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
Well, well, unfortunately I can hardly agree with any of the points of the review. It's very sad that some people can't appreciate this album.
I myself even like the "repetitiveness" some people are complaining about, in the intro of Battle Against Time, for example.
But if you don't like the riffs nor the atmosphere of this album, so be it. Makes me wonder what metal albums you really like.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
"Note that the question is "Was this review well-written?" and NOT "Do you agree with the opinion of this reviewer?""
Well kay, I felt it wasn't well-written because it made no sense to me.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
yeah its pretty active right now
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
I've never seen the site so active since mynameisfryingpan I've never seen so many posts in a review that has been written the same day.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Review was sort of well written, not enough for a pos though.
|
| |
|
|
