Album Rating: 4.5
Some m/ shit right here
|
| |
lol no shit :D
what'd'ya listen to specifically
|
| |
The found about three of them for the first time, but I specifically listened to Natura Renovatur by Giacinto Scelsi the 2nd time around.
|
| |
It's been a while since I listened to something that made me feel the way that album did. :/
|
| |
it made you feel what
bored?
|
| |
not really bored, it flustered me. after a while, I was shaking. I was engaged by it, but I didn't
enjoy it, like I was cringing to it. the entire time, I felt like something was going to happen,
something big, but it never did.
|
| |
yeah dude bach's suites rule omg #4 lajfd
also love 6, prefer maisky's interpretation tho
|
| |
ooh, my friend would always play suite #1 in class. it was always a pleasure to hear. ^_^
|
| |
#1's prelude is one of those things that i feel like is just used way too fuckin' much. it's an awesome piece tho so it doesn't suffer the way 4 seasons does from overexposure
|
| |
your friend is no fournier
|
| |
but fuk, i'm obsessed with his cello suites, i've got six recordings (Casals, Wang, Fournier, Queyras, Rostropovich, Bylsma), might get more, Maisky you say?
|
| |
my friend (knows way more about classical than me, also a cellist) isn't too fond of maisky tho so beware. i know there was one performance from maisky that he really liked but that was it. it might've been #6.
|
| |
sure but as a pianist i despise fur elise, i don't even know how to objectively rate it anymore because i'm so sick of it (and honestly i haven't heard it played in about 5-6 years...), even though i had to do a lot of analysis to play it properly for a concert
that's because it's fur elise
|
| |
ok better example, bach's 1st cello suite's prelude. i'd prob 3.0 it or so, not b/c it isn't a great piece but b/c i've heard it so much.
if i were a cellist i'd prob hate it even more b/c so many cellists play it
|
| |
i'm not talking about hearing it so much that you get sick of it (I think we're on two different discussions here), i'm talking about how a long and focused detailed analysis of this can leads to a much stronger appreciation of this piece because it's so goddamn cool and amazing and all that shit
also if we're gonna talk about cello pieces that need to stop being performed constantly I nominate fucking Saint Saens' Cello Concerto. THERE ARE OTHER CELLO CONCERTI IN THE WORLD, PEOPLE
|
| |
you don't think that kind of analysis requires listening to it so much you get sick of it? for my piano exams i listened to my piece probably 1000 times by a performer my teacher recommended. and honestly i'm a mediocre pianist. but maybe people do musical analysis differently idk
i don't even know that cello concerto (or do i?) all i know is that elgar's and dvorak's are two of my favorite pieces of all time and i don't think either is underperformed
|
| |
elgar's and dvorak's are two of my favorite pieces of all time [2]
Shostakovich also
but they're all behind Bach's, of course
|
| |
gotta get in to classical music
|
| |
Shosty's cello pieces are the shit, ugh
you don't think that kind of analysis requires listening to it so much you get sick of it?
I listened to this constantly for two months, and no I didn't get sick of it (then again I'm in college for analysis and composition so maybe I'm just weird)
I mean, there are some pieces where I easily get sick of them, but plenty of others I could listen to every day until I died (Berlioz' Symphonie Fantastique, Shostakovich's Symphony No 4, Mahler's Symphony No 2, etc)
|
| |
edit: nvm
|
| |
|
|