Taylor Swift 1989
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
Storm In A Teacup
February 16th 2016


47094 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

I used to think lyrics were super important but not anymore. Shake it off passes lyrically to me with the same stance Cygnatti already mentioned

Feather
February 16th 2016


11531 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Style is one of my favorite pop songs ever

SharkTooth
February 16th 2016


15026 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5 | Sound Off

ARE WE OUT OF THE WOODS YET ARE WE OUT OF THE WOODS YET ARE WE OUT OF THE WOODS YET ARE WE OUT OF THE WOODS?

Feather
February 16th 2016


11531 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

I was excited to see Max Martin on stage for his Grammy last night!

LoLifant
March 6th 2016


1577 Comments


everyone who honestly is so pretentious to trademark a fucking year should be hated and all of you praising such a person should be hated too

Artuma
March 6th 2016


32828 Comments


lol

claygurnz
March 6th 2016


7800 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Yeah her whole persona pisses me off. This album is ok though.

Mort.
March 6th 2016


26405 Comments


lolifant as always showing he cant chill and be a good user

tempest--
March 6th 2016


20634 Comments


everyone who honestly is so pretentious to get mad at an album title should be hated

claygurnz
March 6th 2016


7800 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Even if it's the 1979's new LP? If so I'm ready for the hate lol.

Sowing
Moderator
March 6th 2016


45556 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

"New Romantics" should've made the main tracklist [2]

LoLifant
March 6th 2016


1577 Comments


"everyone who honestly is so pretentious to get mad at an album title should be hated"

I don't give a shit about the album title. She trademarked the year "1989", so nobody else can't use it. If you think that's how an honest and normal artist would act, take some meds. Fits well to her ridiculous rant against spotify where she claims herself to be the rebellious leader of all artists.

Mort.
March 6th 2016


26405 Comments


chill fam

tempest--
March 7th 2016


20634 Comments


"Swift may be attempting to trademark her birth year, but that doesn't mean all uses of "1989" will be restricted — just ones related to her album title.."

http://www.usatoday.com/story/life/music/2015/12/11/taylor-swift-applies-for-new-trademarks-1989/77167916/

you're a fucking moron.

LoLifant
March 7th 2016


1577 Comments


Try naming your next book (given you can write more than 5 words per sentence) 1989 and tell me how the lawsuit is going.

But since her spotify rant everyone knows it's all about the money for her anyway.

Cygnatti
March 7th 2016


36399 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Swift may be attempting to trademark her birth year, but that doesn't mean all uses of "1989" will be restricted — just ones related to her album title.
ur not only dumb af, but you're also late af.
If you think that's how an honest and normal artist would act, take some meds.
who here has said that she's normal and honest artist? honest? that can be debatable. but she's certainly not a normal artist, she's one of the biggest in the entire world.


LoLifant
March 7th 2016


1577 Comments


As I said, try naming anything 1989 and we'll see how fast you'll get a letter from her lawyers. Also both of you should stop defending some chick you fap to while imagining she gives a single fuck about you instead of your money lol

Artuma
March 7th 2016


32828 Comments


idk why you'd get so offended by such an insignificant thing unless you were trying to start a company named as 1989

Cygnatti
March 7th 2016


36399 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

you really think you're hot stuff, don't you. nevermind that i'm gay af (not entirely gay but gay af nonetheless) and i have yet to spend a penny on this hoe, but this is exactly just another case of you caring about the dumbest shit when it comes to musicians. shit that really doesn't matter, you're just looking for a reason to hate an artist so you can justify your own biased idiocy, or need i remind you the last time i roasted your bum ass.

Cygnatti
March 7th 2016


36399 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

so there's a recurring pattern to a bunch of your comments. it seems you really, really care about money and who it goes to. you seem generally salty at pop music as a whole because you're under the notion that they're getting so much fame and money for not really working very hard.

this leads me to believe that you either - are a down and out rock artist/musician that writes and performs his own crappy music but can never seem to catch a break no matter how hard he tries - or deeply know someone who is, and as such, you care deeply and obtusely so much these types of things.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy