Album Rating: 5.0
I used to think lyrics were super important but not anymore. Shake it off passes lyrically to me with the same stance Cygnatti already mentioned
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
Style is one of my favorite pop songs ever
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5 | Sound Off
ARE WE OUT OF THE WOODS YET ARE WE OUT OF THE WOODS YET ARE WE OUT OF THE WOODS YET ARE WE OUT OF THE WOODS?
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
I was excited to see Max Martin on stage for his Grammy last night!
|
| |
everyone who honestly is so pretentious to trademark a fucking year should be hated and all of you praising such a person should be hated too
|
| |
lol
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
Yeah her whole persona pisses me off. This album is ok though.
|
| |
lolifant as always showing he cant chill and be a good user
|
| |
everyone who honestly is so pretentious to get mad at an album title should be hated
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
Even if it's the 1979's new LP? If so I'm ready for the hate lol.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
"New Romantics" should've made the main tracklist [2]
|
| |
"everyone who honestly is so pretentious to get mad at an album title should be hated"
I don't give a shit about the album title. She trademarked the year "1989", so nobody else can't use it. If you think that's how an honest and normal artist would act, take some meds. Fits well to her ridiculous rant against spotify where she claims herself to be the rebellious leader of all artists.
|
| |
chill fam
|
| |
"Swift may be attempting to trademark her birth year, but that doesn't mean all uses of "1989" will be restricted — just ones related to her album title.."
http://www.usatoday.com/story/life/music/2015/12/11/taylor-swift-applies-for-new-trademarks-1989/77167916/
you're a fucking moron.
|
| |
Try naming your next book (given you can write more than 5 words per sentence) 1989 and tell me how the lawsuit is going.
But since her spotify rant everyone knows it's all about the money for her anyway.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
Swift may be attempting to trademark her birth year, but that doesn't mean all uses of "1989" will be restricted — just ones related to her album title. ur not only dumb af, but you're also late af.If you think that's how an honest and normal artist would act, take some meds. who here has said that she's normal and honest artist? honest? that can be debatable. but she's certainly not a normal artist, she's one of the biggest in the entire world.
|
| |
As I said, try naming anything 1989 and we'll see how fast you'll get a letter from her lawyers. Also both of you should stop defending some chick you fap to while imagining she gives a single fuck about you instead of your money lol
|
| |
idk why you'd get so offended by such an insignificant thing unless you were trying to start a company named as 1989
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
you really think you're hot stuff, don't you. nevermind that i'm gay af (not entirely gay but gay af nonetheless) and i have yet to spend a penny on this hoe, but this is exactly just another case of you caring about the dumbest shit when it comes to musicians. shit that really doesn't matter, you're just looking for a reason to hate an artist so you can justify your own biased idiocy, or need i remind you the last time i roasted your bum ass.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
so there's a recurring pattern to a bunch of your comments. it seems you really, really care about money and who it goes to. you seem generally salty at pop music as a whole because you're under the notion that they're getting so much fame and money for not really working very hard.
this leads me to believe that you either - are a down and out rock artist/musician that writes and performs his own crappy music but can never seem to catch a break no matter how hard he tries - or deeply know someone who is, and as such, you care deeply and obtusely so much these types of things.
|
| |
|
|