Album Rating: 2.5
I think Slipknot has this misconception that their fans who aren't teenagers actually give a fuck about the identity/mask/whatever nonsense.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
New album is decent, having heard all the songs at least once I'd say it's slightly inferior to Iowa
|
| |
ALL SHRIMP ARE PRAWNS
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
It's better than this, and that's surprising.
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.5
If they ditched the masks I don't think they would receive nearly as much shit
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
new one is a shitload better than this
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
At this point yeah, they've probably already peaked in popularity and should just focus on making the best MUSIC they can since they're obviously talented enough, and stop worrying about their image and secret identities which are all outed anyway.
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.5
It's funny because the whole numbering of members and wearing of masks was to originally keep anonymity to the band, so there's really no point behind it at this point.
and Psychosocial might be catchy, but I wouldn't call it good
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
a handful of songs on .5 are about on par with psychosocial imo
.5 is also much more consistent than this
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
Yeah. I'm not that big on Psychosocial. There are way too many, "hey, this is a relevant style of metal" moments in that song.
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.5
"Yeah. I'm not that big on Psychosocial. There are way too many, "hey, this is a relevant style of metal" moments in that song."
Solid comment
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
tbh I think that they should still keep the masks, just for entertainment value, but this whole identity secrecy "we're not revealing the identities of our already known non-permanent band members" thing is ridiculous. I really like Slipknot but they're just taking it too far and no-one is taking it seriously except them.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off
, but it's awkward when they're writing songs with an Iowa influence next to the ones
that sound all Stone Sour-y
[2]
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
.5 has more consistency than AHIG which is why it's better overall, but it lacks any stand out songs. Like a second rate, melodic Iowa.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
And how is that? Lol
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
new album is meh overall, 3-4 decent/good songs can't save it from a dozen painfully average and few horrible songs
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
That sounds more like all 80s thrash fans and 1/4 of 80s metal fans to me.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
I have metal band shirts but I hardly wear them.
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
AOV, Killpop and Goodbye are pretty good
custer is terrible
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
dude i liked this band before and still like a good amount of their songs. Vol.3 is a great album for example (and their best), so idk what you mean.. the new album is just not that good.
|
| |
|
|