isn't this kind of...stale? like, it's really well executed, but it doesn't really bring anything they haven't bought before

Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off

Which is all that fans ask for.

Album Rating: 4.0

How people find this completly stale?



Yeah it is surely stale from the point of incorporating new things in their music, but refining the quality of the things they've brought albums after albums is certainly not stale IMO.



As for the rating of this, it's pretty much going up and down for me..

i'm not saying i don't like it (hint: i do), but given their reputation for boundary-pushing and experimentation i was expecting something groundbreaking on this one too

maybe i'm asking too much for a band to innovate every album, i dunno

Album Rating: 4.0

I see it as more of a collection and refinement of their past efforts. As someone who fucking loves

past Dillinger, that's perfect for me personally, but I can see why someone hoping for innovation or

novelty would find it disappointing.

Lol @ all the 5's. The vocalist totally ruins this band, it's a pity.

top lel

Album Rating: 4.5 | Sound Off

joke opinion

Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off

Badass record.

Album Rating: 2.5

can we please not bring /mu/'s cancer onto sputnik that would be cool

Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off

TAKE



TAKE WHAT YOU CAN

Album Rating: 3.5

its a real opinion lol



gregs vocals are really annoying on OP

Album Rating: 4.5 | Sound Off

this isnt OP

Album Rating: 3.5

yah duh but i can understand why people dont like the vocals

it's definitely an acquired taste thing at least

Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off

I think he can belt quite well, and his screaming isn't all that agitating.

Album Rating: 3.5

he tries to impersonate mike patton a lot, which is annoying sometimes

I've always loved all of his vocals

but mike patton is awesome, so even a budget mike patton impersenator is better than most vocalists

Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off

Haven't much listened to Mike Patton, I need to get on that.