Album Rating: 1.5
If that's the best defense you can do then I feel sorry for this band.
Popularity has no bearing on actual quality, though increased exposure begets more critical analysis and provokes the chance of hype or anti-hype trains.
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.5
"Surprised you guys aren't shitting on "Younger", has single written all over it."
Who the fuck cares if it has single written all over it. This album isn't exactly unaccessible in any way.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off
I know posting shit like that is stupid and in 2 weeks or whatever I'm gonna regret posting that comment but I just don't understand where the anti-hype train came from because there were MAYBE 10 people who posted on Fake History going "this band sucks" and then this comes out and every other person is railing on them
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off
In any event someone needs to get on that CD rip shit cause they're sellin it at Warped now
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
this is a pop album. done with such harshness that i'm kinda wondering how they pulled it off so well. Jason obviously pushes things to a new level. but still, so catchy and warm feeling it's amazing. haters can suck eggs.
|
| |
your name is accurate
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
I just don't understand where the anti-hype train came from
Sputnik basically likes to shit on any up-and-coming bands. A good way to increase your objectivity
percentage is to rate an album you were never going to like anyway.
|
| |
eh?
this place dick rided the fuck out of this band to no end when Fake History came out
|
| |
and they're not an up and coming band
they've been around since 2002
granted they were undeniably shit on every level imaginable (Even the singer admitted this)
|
| |
gbbbfhb
|
| |
yup
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
"Yeah, it seems that after giving Falling in Reverse a perfect production job, they decided to half-ass this. It's really pissing me off the decision Epitaph makes sometimes."
Nah, the re-release was produced by epitaph, letlive. chose someone else for the new album
|
| |
I know posting shit like that is stupid and in 2 weeks or whatever I'm gonna regret posting that comment but I just don't understand where the anti-hype train came from because there were MAYBE 10 people who posted on Fake History going "this band sucks" and then this comes out and every other person is railing on them
all the users with decent taste were like lol this band is horrible
believe it or not it was a lot more than 10 lolz
yeah not gonna listen to this
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.5
Sputnik basically likes to shit on any up-and-coming bands. A good way to increase your objectivity percentage is to rate an album you were never going to like anyway. lol, this kind of thinking again.
|
| |
Sputnik basically likes to shit on any up-and-coming bands. A good way to increase your objectivity
percentage is to rate an album you were never going to like anyway.
yeah not sure this actually happens buddy
and the "you just don't like it because it's popular!!!" defense is just as trite and generic and untrue as letlive. is
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.5
that kind of stuff only happens to really really popular bands, mostly bands that people are sick of hearing on the radio so no, that doesn't apply here.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
It's still a 4, chill out.
There are only like 3 albums I saw in 2 years where I found that my personal rating is way off from the average.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
By the way, I like this boy much more than their first LP.
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
"wtf why dont u like this??? It has catchy choruses and it isnt on bandcamp, sputnik are just hipsters XD. Fug the haters! :DDDD"
No, piss off.
This band always has been catchy.
Fake History was my AOTY and they are amazing live, but this is just really bad. I'm only keeping this at a 3 because the quality might be better on the final release.(don't count on it)
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
First LP? Do you mean Speak Like You Talk or Fake History?
|
| |
|
|
