In Flames Sounds of a Playground Fading
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
JWT155
June 18th 2011


15039 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Listening through again not in the car and I'm enjoying it more.

Shleebz
June 18th 2011


13 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Good review....I agree with the same 3 songs most have chosen to be the best on this album. Undoubtably this is waaay better than "ASOP", but that isnt saying much. Anders is dead to me. His vocals were so sick in "Come Clarity" and "Soundtrack to your Escape". But his experiment to soften things up took a nose dive. Cheers for trying...but please dont try again.



I still enjoyed the album, but nothing will compare to "Come Clarity", "Jester Race", "Colony", or "Sountrack to your Escape" for me. Those albums were too good. And though Im a huge In Flames fan, ASOP was pretty terrible and this one is only a step towards the positive. But thats a good thing!



Oh and I thought Jester's Door was lame as fuck





Asiatic667
June 18th 2011


4651 Comments


all I care about from these guys is come clarity. Colony's ok, but I've kind of lost interest in them

Willie
Moderator
June 19th 2011


20672 Comments

Album Rating: 3.2

Colony and Jester Race are easily their best... everything else has only been good (or worse).

mariothehedgehog
June 19th 2011


375 Comments


whoracle

Irving
Emeritus
June 19th 2011


7496 Comments


Great read, Willie. A job well done, I would say.

Spec
June 19th 2011


41432 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Should I even listen to this?

Outnumbered
June 19th 2011


370 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Yes just do it.

FearThyEvil
June 19th 2011


19397 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

I'm still shocked at the decent ratings this is getting. I know 3.3 avg is pretty low but I was expecting like 2.5-2.8.

Yazz_Flute
June 19th 2011


19174 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

3.3 is the perfect rating for this.

Willie
Moderator
June 19th 2011


20672 Comments

Album Rating: 3.2

3.3 is good... Almost great. Doesn't anyone actually read the words under the numbers?

Yazz_Flute
June 19th 2011


19174 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

I don't know how to read.



I can, however, type.

JWT155
June 19th 2011


15039 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Mind is blown.

Willie
Moderator
June 19th 2011


20672 Comments

Album Rating: 3.2

@Yazz: First, that comment was for FearThyEvil. Second what's your point, anyway?

Captain North
June 19th 2011


6793 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off

The words are wrong though, since mathematically 3 is average.

Willie
Moderator
June 19th 2011


20672 Comments

Album Rating: 3.2

Yeah, but financially the guy paying for the site said 'fuck the math'.

Captain North
June 19th 2011


6793 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off

Yeah but okay.

FearThyEvil
June 19th 2011


19397 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

3.3 is good... Almost great. Doesn't anyone actually read the words under the numbers?



I realize what it says but most albums with that aren't to well liked within this community. Plus I really expected this to be much lower than what it actually has.

Willie
Moderator
June 19th 2011


20672 Comments

Album Rating: 3.2

That's cause people just rate based on this whole 'math fad' that magically says that all the possible ratings end up making '3' average. There was a time when we could burn people for speaking that witchcraft mumbo jumbo.

Asiatic667
June 19th 2011


4651 Comments


sooooo....... is this at least as good as come clarity?



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy