Album Rating: 5.0
Guys this was only flagged for like 5 minutes over a year ago, so why are we treating it like the default review lol, take that over to the Crack the Skye thread
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
"Because it doesn't reflect the commonly held opinion of the album. Necrotica's review is just as good and reflects the general consensus of the site more accurately."
eh, it's sort of fanboyish
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
Oh if we're talking about BWP then yea it's a well written review but not exactly the one that should represent one of the highest rated albums on the site. Necro's review is excellent.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
necrotica's a decent writer and i appreciate him for reviewing as passionately as he did but from a strictly technical standpoint i don't think he was ever a staff-level writer
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
I honestly can't remember, it's been so long since I read anything he wrote from before 2016. All us staffers have had some subpar reviews at times though, especially from the beginning before being promoted. I remember Necro's recent reviews of PT being impressive.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
"I mean. This is a great review and all, but it ain't too convincing when only 109 people thought this deserved a lower score than a 3/5, as opposed to the other 3856 people who rated this thing. Not only that, but the majority of the reviews are glowing with positivity of this record and are scattered about everywhere. Idk man, I'm really not as picky as those select 109 people."
So basically all different perspectives should not be considered as much because it goes against the vast majority and the weight of said arguments should be judged by the amount of people who initially saw differently rather than the quality of said review...yeah fuck off.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
"yeah well if this is your kinda music then sure it's likely in a way that you'll dig this but other people's opinions shouldn't really be a factor for your own enjoyment"
Did you not hear what I just said? I said it's highly unlikely that I'll hold the same opinion as him, that's it. It has no bearing on my opinion when I get the chance to listen to the record.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
This review is more repetitive and boring than what you claim Ghost Reveries to be.
|
| |
Ode to the contrarian
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
This review sucks.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
Best Opeth album
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
This was my first Opeth album and my second fav. First fav on some days.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
You and I Hawks can both agree though that this and MAYH is their best two albums though.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
Fuck yesssssss.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
You're not alone, it's the truth m/m/m/m/
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
Great review, totally agree with it. Never been a fan of this album either.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
Why not?
You can't leave us hanging like that.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
I thought that Opeth was metal... I guess I was wrong...
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5 | Sound Off
Good ol’ Dethtrasher
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
@Egarran
Because after the twins, Ghost sounds like a step back, a failed attempt to recreate BWP or SL. I dont blame Mikael, but his fanatic death metal fans who treatened to kill his cats around 2003.
|
| |
|
|