Album Rating: 4.5

What... the fuck? a rating of '1' for this cd? get out of

here... This is a modern day classic.This Message Edited On 09.10.08

Album Rating: 4.0

I wouldn't go that far, but the album does rule

Album Rating: 1.5

Album sucks really bad.

Album Rating: 3.0

I'm really digging it right now.

Album's well good.

Album Rating: 3.0

Now I Lay Thee Down is amazing, straight up

Album Rating: 4.0

Werd, though Aesthetics and Halo are my top two...only song i don't really dig is wolves

relistened to this today, and its still really fuckin terrible

Album Rating: 3.5

Besides Rob's vocals, the musicianship on this album is pretty tight and the songs are memorable. I don't see how anyone, including Mikesn, could warrant this a 1-1.5. Its simply better than that. Sorry, I had to kick the dead horse hahaha.

I don't like this band, I guess they're too bland.

Album Rating: 3.5

Check out their first two albums if you haven't.

YAAAAAARG!

Ok I might when I am not busy reviewing mediocre hip hop.

Album Rating: 3.5

Damn, why would you put yourself through that kind of hell? Hip hop in general = poo! hahahaha I just don't get it.

bastard is to hip hop, as ilikemusicthatsucks is to pop punk.

Sometimes they like even the shittiest of the genre (like how ilikemusicthatsucks gave Cute Is What We Aim For a 3.5, and I gave Shwayze a 3.)

Album Rating: 3.5

Who are those bands? hahahahaha Rock/ Metal/ Jazz/ Blues/ Electronic = all I ever need!

needs moar punk.

Album Rating: 3.5

oh ya, punk too. I'm not so much into punk anymore because it lead me into metal. Metal ruined me!

Album Rating: 3.0

The two highlights you mentioned here are so goddamn good. Even if you gave it a 1.

Album Rating: 4.5

I don't agree that this album should be given a 1 rating, sure it was over hyped a lot, Machine Head are fags and Revolver called it Album of the Year and what not, but the album itself inst that bad. But it's not better than a 3 rating.

it's pretty damn awesome actually ...