Album Rating: 4.5
why is this no longer a 4.4
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
sorry
|
| |
can i 5.0 this again on the same account
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
do it
|
| |
it’s as good as done
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
what this album has that other BoC albums do not have - "I LOVE YOU"
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
Now this is where it's at
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
"Rue the Whirl" is my jam *tweet**tweet**chirp**chirp*
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
"It would be wise to remember that the same people
Who would stop you from listening to Boards of Canada..."
why would somebody want to try and stop me from listening to Boards of Canada though...? O.O
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
oraaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaange
|
| |
what is up
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
nm
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
brianmelter
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Fuck Brian. All my homies hate Brian.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
Music Has the Right to Monoliths
That's a cool title if you ask me.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
The only redeeming factor is that it was created when genre was in it's infancy. Every composer had their experimental album with lots of bleeps, bloops, swooshes, ring modulators, lasers and phasers. They omitted just one ingredient - music. I know that this kind of experimentation can be called music (20th century broadened that term beyond reasonable boundaries), but I would like to see who really enjoys this and on what pseudo-intellectual level. What once sounded daring and innovative today sounds terribly outdated, just because new technology blocked artist's vision and became it's only reason for existence. Whenever you rely on technology as your singular medium of expression, you are bound to become obsolete, often sooner than you can imagine.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
is that Shakespeare?
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
Music has no right to be overrated as fuck
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
Based zak
|
| |
how is this idm? who would ever dance to this?
|
| |
|