Album Rating: 4.0

Okay saying I don’t like them st all is a stretch but yeah those other five tracks are about a 3.

It makes sense because the chorus on Lookers is phenomenal and I think the one on Your Wild Years is a tremendous slog. That and I just find Lookers substantially more engaging on the whole. Black Mass is really boring too. This album travels an incredibly thin line much of the time between being engaging and catchy and just being boring (the boring part being those five tracks)

Album Rating: 5.0

so why is Black Mass boring but then Growing On You -TSSF isn't? lol sorry I'm just trying to see the logic, like I feel both serve a similar purpose, even more so for Black Mass because it's placed at a great spot in the album that allows you to reflect and catch your breath for a minute before the craziness starts back up again. and emotional as fuck

Album Rating: 4.0

The difference there is I just don’t find the instrumental-side of Black Mass nearly as effective as Growing On You. Not even close for me. That and Parker’s vocal delivery there (which is a huge part of why that song is so good) >>>>>>>>>>>>> vocals on Black Mass

Album Rating: 5.0

but bro that part where he like "we used to get high and stare at the mooooon" is just fuckin bootiful

Album Rating: 4.0

It just doesn’t do much for me my guy. One of these days I’ll have to try out their other records

Album Rating: 4.0

Sculptors and Vandals n I Can’t Seem to Tell are probably my two favs on OTIP



Black Mass is wonderful, simple but beautiful

Album Rating: 4.0

"Because there’s still 5 tracks I don’t like at all"



In that case, how the fuck is this a 4.

Album Rating: 4.5

in what world is any vocal performance by parker cannon better than any vocal performance of greg barnetts

Album Rating: 4.0

Black Mass is awesome. Fun song to play too, i just do the open chords and sing it and my buddy does a guitar rendition of what the bass is doing while using a kick drum. So fun.

Album Rating: 4.0

does Peter even sing a song on this

Album Rating: 4.0

Peter?

Album Rating: 4.0

I meant Parker lmaooo I got Spider-Man on the mind

Album Rating: 4.0

@Adolf yeah I’m honestly thinking of revisiting this in whole soon and potentially dropping it, but I did retract my statement in my next comment, saying those five are around a 3 for me. Mathematically, the average across all tracks comes out to right around a 4.



@Oni in the world where Growing on You and Black Mass are being compared lol. Sorry, just find the performance on TSSF’s track a lot more enjoyable. Those falsettos get me everytime



On a side note, I’m jamming Chamberlin Waits at the moment and it fucking bangs

Album Rating: 5.0

"in what world is any vocal performance by parker cannon better than any vocal performance of greg barnetts"



ha uhhh I mean yeah I prefer Greg but Parker has more range than most male adults. Most of the vocal parts he wrote in WYDS are blisteringly high and aggressive, and there are plenty of songs where his flow runs laps around Greg's. Again, love Greg and usually prefer Greg. But don't be naive to enough to say Parker has nothing on him.

I feel like Parker has the same tone and cadence in every single TSSF song

Album Rating: 5.0

listen to their new album and read your comment again.

even better - listen to their new album, then their debut, then re-read your comment like 3 times

Album Rating: 4.5

Greg has way more personality imo, Parker sounds pretty generic as far as pop punk goes, not that I dislike his vocals, I do enjoy them quite a bit still.

Album Rating: 5.0

yeah he has more personality, for sure.

although when it comes to stage presence and talking to the crowd, he's just about as bad as parker at this point. Tom carries their stage presence on his back

Album Rating: 4.0

Yeah, Greg doesnt move around much. He looks like hes having a lot of fun anyways though.

Album Rating: 4.5

oh yeah tom has all the stage presence as far as performance goes, but sound wise they are flawless