King Crimson Red
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
menawati
February 13th 2014


16750 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

too late man you been quoted now without full context

rockandmetaljunkie
Contributing Reviewer
February 13th 2014


10052 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

It's a fuckin masterpiece.

MrSirLordGentleman
February 13th 2014


15343 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

5 it, hard

KILL
February 13th 2014


81582 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

too many bitches 4.5n

DrMaximus
February 13th 2014


12896 Comments


Keep the 5's going

rockandmetaljunkie
Contributing Reviewer
February 13th 2014


10052 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

I think I will Gentleman.

MrSirLordGentleman
February 13th 2014


15343 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

good, we're getting closer to the 4.6



making this album to reach 4.6 will be one of my objetives this year

KILL
February 13th 2014


81582 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

you care too much about averages dude its not a good sign!

MrSirLordGentleman
February 13th 2014


15343 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

it's just that this site has averages that are soooo fucked up, it gives a bad impression to people that looks a this site for musical recommendations, they will go for the album with higher averages even when most of the time they're not the better albums

Gwyn.
February 13th 2014


17270 Comments


What if, (and this is just my insane mind coming up with ridiculous shit!!) they like the albums with the higher averages more

MrSirLordGentleman
February 13th 2014


15343 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

that applies for people that listen to most of the discog from a band, including albums with lower averages, but that doesn't apply to people that will only listen to the album that has a high average... a lot of the albums on this site have a high average only because they're "popular" albums, like, seriously, Nevermind would have such a slower average if it wasn't for the people that 5 it only because "it is a classic, or that's what sales and Rolling Stone magazine said" lol

Gwyn.
February 13th 2014


17270 Comments


Dude not even this would have as many 5s as it does if it wasn't old prog rock and all "critic approved" and shit I can guarantee you a huge chunk of the 5s and 4.5s are alts and people who only 5 the "classics" because aint nobody gonna critize them for it

if it was newer and stuff a lot of those guys would prob 4 it max because they want to look all "objective" badly!

oltnabrick
February 13th 2014


41076 Comments


Worst page smh now I am here

MrSirLordGentleman
February 13th 2014


15343 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

yeah, exactly, that it is, even though I don't know if it should apply to this album, it's not like it is a popular album (outside the obvious prog community), I've never seen it on rankings or something, only ItCotCK obviously

Mongi123
February 13th 2014


22472 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

Why are people arguing about the average haha

Gwyn.
February 13th 2014


17270 Comments


Just got worse

Chortles
February 13th 2014


21494 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

it's just that this site has averages that are soooo fucked up, it gives a bad impression to people that looks a this site for musical recommendations, they will go for the album with higher averages even when most of the time they're not the better albums




Dumb



oltnabrick
February 13th 2014


41076 Comments


Almost as bad as the c4c thread

MeatSalad
February 13th 2014


18669 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

Now that you're in it yeah

menawati
February 13th 2014


16750 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

just think about the average, what use have they for you ?

(oh wrong band wrong album but never mind)



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy