I'm literally agreeing with you guys but okay

Maybe I should say imo more often

"like honestly most critics hated pinkerton because it was WEEZER making it."

this isn't you agreeing with me moron this is you being blatantly wrong

happens when yr 12 and don't know absolutely anything, I get it but shit

okay torts lmao

I just meant in general it was hated upon release but okay the wording was bad

steve who hurt you?

what were you even trying to say? were you saying it was hated on because it didn't sound like the same weezer that did blue album or were you saying that critics didn't like weezer ever?

Album Rating: 3.5

Didn't Rolling Stone name it worst album of the year (not that they know shit in general)

the first one lmao

It was chosen as the 3rd worst album of 1996 by rolling stone and the general consensus of the album was that it shouldnt of been self produced, the sexual lyrics were bad, and it wasn't as accessible as blue.

Album Rating: 4.0

thought it was 2nd worst behind razorblade suitcase iirc (probably wrong)

[2] @ year

well i mean i like how personal it is, i just think a lot of the lyrics are pretty poor

rivers prolly agrees with all those things, too

good.

Album Rating: 3.5

Yeah the lyrics are bad in places but they express feelings most dudes have had at one time or the other

If everyone's a little queer, can't they be a little straight?

pinkerton's lyrics read like the kinda stuff 98% of the people who call them bad would write if they were writing honestly about themselves and their sex life

That's the 133th dumbest thing i've ever read

it may be dumb, but its true. shit resonated with a lot of people to make it a cult classic for a reason.

I agree it was a self deprecating joke(about my comments)

I think the problem is more so River's writing skills and NOT the subject material which is fine and honestly not even that offensive.