Album Rating: 3.5

You worded that better than I did. I do get why people were disappointed, I just don’t agree and wish other people could look past the more simple approach taken here. But to each their own, obviously.

Album Rating: 5.0

BUT wHeres the Metal!!!11!

Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off

!!!!!!!!!

Album Rating: 2.0

Where's the good songwriting?

Album Rating: 2.5

damn, that interview with the guitarists just made me kinda depressed.

Album Rating: 3.0

I really enjoyed this at first but over time it got less and less memorable for me. Still a few good tracks though.

Album Rating: 2.5

I feel like this is a solid 3.3-3.5

current avg is too harsh, simply because its underoath and everyone expected better. If this was a new band of 20 yr olds that came out of nowhere, it'd be way better received.

Album Rating: 3.5

^ this exactly this

Album Rating: 2.5

Which interview?

Album Rating: 2.0

If this was a new band we'd still call this shit mids.

Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off

Yea this is pretty middle of the road no matter who released it

Yeah that interview makes the guitarists seem oblivious

Album Rating: 3.0

If this was a new band we'd still call this shit mids. [2]

Album Rating: 2.5

What interview are we talking about

Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off

The one bloc posted last page

Album Rating: 2.5

I'm a doof

Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off

ily

Album Rating: 2.5

If this was a new band we'd never listen to it because it's forgettable



but because Underoath was once great we had to give it a shot

Album Rating: 4.0

Underoath are still great, y'all are just being silly.

Album Rating: 3.5

Alright alright 4.5 lets not get too crazy

Would rather see that than anything below a 2.5 tho