Album Rating: 3.5
To Rid the Disease never gets old
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
opeth are different things for different people. for me -- a non-metal fan -- it's about song composition and the structure of the art piece. vocals are also a main thing for me, since i love good singers
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
Nice way to look at music
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
i can't fault this album
|
| |
Last good Opeth album.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
Disagreed
|
| |
Downhill after this.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
they released some far better stuff after this
|
| |
What, Ghost Reveries? Lol.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
that yeah, and watershed and heritage
|
| |
Oh yeah Watershed isn't that bad, but is definitely inferior than almost everything they did prior to this. GR in the other hand is incredibly overrated and Heritage is Heritage.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
gr and watershed are both pretty "controlledly" all over the place which i dig and on heritage they really nailed the whole 70s prog jerk-off thing. haven't jammed this band in years though
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
None of the last three all singing albums come close to this let alone the better portion of their discog.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
I think Heritage is up there
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
ehh, i find this to be pretty monotonous and lifeless but the atmosphere is sometimes spot on, especially on weakness
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
Atmosphere is amazing on here
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
Opeth have always nailed atmosphere
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
disagree but on mayh and still life they most certainly did
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
GR too imo
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
gr isn't really about the atmosphere imo
|
| |
|
|