Album Rating: 4.2 | Sound Off
lol some user with the most milquetoast post-rock ratings I've seen this year 1'd this
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
and the only good godspeed album
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
reiterations is so hard
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
fr, that one has stuck out to me the most
|
| |
SpongeBob chocolate grandma voice “the lamb as WAHT” chocolate mom voice “EFFIGY maw the lamb as EFFIGY”
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
“but I'm curious, how often are all of you giving this a high rating actually going to revisit this?”
“ but I can't say that it justifies it being good music”
I’m not stanning for this that hard but I don’t get this logic. Even if it’s true that this is a one and done listen, which I don’t think it will be for me at least, 1 uber special impactful listen > 20 quite pleasant listens. Re-listenability / ease of listenablity often corolate with, but aren’t uniquely indicative of, “good music” (imo).
I could see the argument that it’s easier to form a personal connection with a briefer / easier record than a longer / more challenging record (heck, most (all) of my 5s are easy listening short bois) but I don’t think that’s the point you’re making. I’m getting pedantic now tho so I’ll go sit myself in a corner and count some rocks.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
I've listened to this 3 times in full and a couple more in chunks i think it's sticking around a while
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
i've been jamming this daily since checking
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
I haven't heard a single track from it but I think it's likely an instant classic
|
| |
Only on the third track but this rules
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
reiterations rules but i am 7 minutes into margin for error and i think that was enough of this album for me hahaha
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
'Re-listenability / ease of listenablity often corolate with, but aren’t uniquely indicative of, “good music” (imo).'
Yep. I'm not stepping forward in defence of this (might need to hear it first!), but as a general point you speak the truth
|
| |
What happened to Jesper after that…
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
i switched to just mustard
|
| |
Reiterations is hitting hard rn
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
This sounds fuckin sweet
|
| |
Yeah I think I love this, Margin For Error is inteeeeense
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
"1 uber special impactful listen > 20 quite pleasant listens"
I guess this is where I disagree as I take the opposite stance, which is what makes everyone's rating systems different. a big reason for me holding an album in high regard is because it makes me want to revisit it over and over again while feeling the same impact.
also, I should revoke my use of 'good music'. what I really meant was 'replayable music' as you pointed out.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
plenty of albums have exceptional replay value without hitting the highs of something you end up playing once in a blue moon, so yeah I guess that’s just a different way of evaluating music
However, I find the former (for me) often might last months, yet the latter can last many years even if those listen take a hell of a lot longer to accumulate
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
plenty of albums have exceptional replay value without hitting the highs of something you end up playing once in a blue moon, so yeah I guess that’s just a different way of evaluating music
However, I find the former (for me) often might last months, yet the latter can last many years even if those listens take a hell of a lot longer to accumulate
|
| |
|
|
