Album Rating: 1.0
@Colton: Definitely. I don’t necessarily trust what they say, but I can usually read between the lines.
|
| |
uhhhhhh I think metacritic removed the sput review
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
"metacritic is unfortunately very relevant "
and once again I am let down by humanity...oh well back to the rock under which I live.
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.0
viva la rock
this rev was never added to metacritic in the first place - whether or not that'll change is hot goss. mmm
|
| |
wait, so they were bitching about a review that hadn’t even been picked up by metacritic yet?
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.0
For whatever it’s worth (nada) the review is absolutely fine by my reckoning and this authoritarianism/censorship shall not be tolerated here. We will rise up and stand above those that choose to oppose us.
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.0
erm
yes.
(noler)
defeat censorship slay lobbying cultists [2]
|
| |
telling them not to put it up, as they have done with Sputnik in the past
|
| |
thats
|
| |
man
|
| |
I think the neatest resolution is if Sowing quickly knocks up a trademark 5 review for this while simultaneously learning Portuguese
|
| |
i've decided i'm gonna just not listen to this and let my 1 stand
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.0
It's hard work, but somebody's gotta do it
|
| |
I thought your review got picked up and people were so mad because of its negative influence on the average. Fact that they are going out of their way to find your review makes it even more pathetic.
|
| |
Even if it does the average would drop, what, half a point?
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.0
It’s easy work actually. Good decision though, you won’t benefit.
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.0
Are we holding the line chaps?
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
People on Twitter claiming the review barely comments on the music lol. That's juuuust not true.
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.0
We’re so far beyond the line, we can’t even see the line anymore. The line is a dot to us.
|
| |
it don’t pay much, but it’s honest work
|
| |
|
|
