Album Rating: 5.0
And then the song goes from 1 to 100, lol
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
Riff City.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
Did you ever see the Lost in Vegas reaction to the song? Pretty entertaining. They weren't the hugest fans of the track, but I'm glad they approached it with an open mind and acknowledged why other people would love the song and album, instead of just brushing the whole thing off
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
I used to watch them quite a bit, seemed like chill dudes and they always brought an honest perspective too.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
Yeah, that's why I love their work so much. Plus, their videos are basically reviews on top of reactions, so you get meaningful commentary and not just two guys silently listening for the entire duration
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
THIS
IS
NOT
A
TEST OF POWERRRR
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
THIS
IS
NOT
A
GAAMMME
TO BE LOST OR WOONN
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
rules
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
rules indeed
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
first time listening, holy fucking shit I’ve been missing out
wasn’t expecting the production to be this immaculate
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
^ Yeah, the production is damn impressive for a 1995 DM recording. Then again, this was their first under Roadrunner, and I'm sure that gave them quite a boost
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off
Nice page
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
If you like the production of this get the first Canadian press CD, it's the cleanest and most dynamic version of this album. It's very hard to find and expensive, but like those early Rush CDs it's the best sounding version by a margin
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
I've got the first edition of Symbolic too.
-- it's the best sounding version by a margin
That margin can be huge, depending on the album.
I have the first editions from Eldritch El Niño and Headquake, both '90s metal albums, whose sound work rips, as opposed to every 21st century digital resource (including Bandcamp) which is noticeably compromised.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
Always nice to find more audiophiles Voivod!
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
two at the same time? why not
|
| |
|
|
