Album Rating: 4.5
i don't use big words like that lightly
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
evidently you do
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off
three good songs on this damn rip
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off
Why is this junk review the first one to come up?
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
I can understand why people wouldn't like this. Flossie and Jackalope mostly are bad, and a couple others are forgettable. But Philosopher King, Winner, Man of the Year, and Deception all really get it done for me. A lot of style call backs to past albums, which was needed after IG came out and sucked it up
|
| |
Review's not bad but it's like you didn't try to come up with an opening
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off
review is great. everybody who has said it isn't has this at a 5
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off
It's definitely a good review
|
| |
Great review, yeah.
|
| |
It's good I'm just saying it feels like I started reading a review half way through it
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off
not true
|
| |
I'm glad you know what I think better than I do, Futures
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off
Album Rating: 5.0
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off
"unmemorability" is not a word.
|
| |
"Album Rating: 5.0"
roasted
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
This album has honestly lost some of its luster for me. I loved it the first couple of listens, but now I feel that I like 7 of the songs and the rest are just meh
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
"but now I feel that I like 7 of the songs and the rest are just meh"
I had this at a 4 and bumped it down for the same reason. Probably would've held higher for me at 10 or 11 songs instead of 13
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.7
@oisincoleman to be fair you're actually right, I did have an opening with introduced things in a much more natural way by focusing on the album as a whole, but it sucked and I wanted to get straight to the point so I cut it
|
| |
"roasted"
Tbh yeah
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
I love this band and I love this record.
Haters
|
| |
|
|