This is a rant, not a review.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
Even if you don't believe in their political POV, you can't deny that they were ultra-talented musicians
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
I'm glad this shithead took the time to give all RATM albums a 1
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
Time well wasted, as they exist no more
|
| |
Good.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
There's no way the person that wrote this actually exists.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
The only other 1 for the album comes from another review. Heh
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
Parts of this album annoy me but other than that it is excellent
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
ALL OF WHICH ARE AMERICAN DREAMS
ALL OF WHICH ARE AMERICAN DREAMS
ALL OF WHICH ARE AMERICAN DREAMS
ALL OF WHICH ARE AMERICAN DREAMS
ALL OF WHICH ARE AMERICAN DREAMS
ALL OF WHICH ARE AMERICAN DREAMS
ALL OF WHICH ARE AMERICAN DREAMS
ALL OF WHICH ARE AMERICAN DREAMS
ALL OF WHICH
ARE AMERICAN DREAMS
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
Boom be de boom be de bum bom boom be de boom be de BWE.
Boom be de boom be de bum bom boom be de boom be de bum bom.
Boom be de boom be de bum bom boom be de boom be de BWEHWEHWEH.
|
| |
Capitalism does not stand for exploitation of workers. Capitalism does not exploit workers.
Socialism does.Capitalism does not stand for exploitation of workers. Capitalism does not exploit
workers. Socialism does."
Your mistake is assuming that because a word is in the dictionary that it has a conveyable meaning
in any significant sense in the way you are using it. Without a 'concrete definition' and only your
vague definition 'it means no one in government owns production', you can effectively use the two
terms interchangeably (IE not scientifically as you are pretending to do) when they suit your point
or don't IE minimum wage;
if the minimum wage is being talked about as prevention to exploit workers you would probably call
it 'capitalism', if talking about interfering with industrial growth hindered by high labor costs
you would probably call the minimum wage socialism.
See? Nothing about "exploitation".
It just means that the means of production are owned by individuals rather than the government
(which occurs under socialism).
Fantastically rich people can and do buy the government IE senators, congressman and even The
President. Not to mention the media. The sad thing is most of the funding is transparent and
Americans still don't understand this. Also owning means of production is a communist tenet not a
socialist one...
Im a libertarian and not a socialist in any way but comparing Che Guevara to Hitler ... ?
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5 | Sound Off
YEAH
THE MOVEMENTS IN MOTION WITH MASS MILITANT POETRY
NOW CHECK THIS OUT...
UGH!
|
| |
This is still going on
|
| |
The way this entire review is worded makes me wanna punch the guy in the face. "Dur I use big words because it's gonna make my argument make sense". I mean, guy, you use the phrase "I should say not" unironically. You might as well put on a fucking monocle and top hat or some shit
And by "argument" I mean "political rant thinly veiled as a review"
Also lol at "generic rap-metal albums" hahaha
|
| |
how many times does everyone have to say it
you
cannot
take
this
review
seriously
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
thread is too good to pass up. hrad bmup
|
| |
yes
|
| |
@reviewer
The problem with the review is you ranted for way too long about capitalism/communism and made
countless banal references to communism sucking, to review an album that isn't solely focused on
communism. Also your tone comes across as pompous, much more so than RATM on this album.
Instead of anyone on the thread pointing this out, you had 5-10 intellectual-midgets calling you a
retard. For over 150 comments. I feel your pain.
|
| |
lol 8 pages already gj fellas
|
| |
This review has so many flawed misconceptions throughout that it works. Its like, I have to keep
reading to see what the next one-sided view is.
That one about Plato was absolute gold.
|
| |
|
|
