Bullet For My Valentine Temper Temper
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
foxxxythnksustnk
February 10th 2013


2131 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

ill stivk with mine

YankeeDudel
February 10th 2013


9342 Comments


anything below a 3 is negative since 3 is average.

not sure why 2.5 means average on this site when we cant give lower than a 1.

and anything with an actual average rating of 2.5 is horrienderous

anarchistfish
February 10th 2013


30368 Comments


What the fuck's the point of differentiating between things you don't like? It just means you have ridiculously inflated ratings and people who have like 80 5s. It's just pointless.

YankeeDudel
February 10th 2013


9342 Comments


What are you even babbling about. Your system stinks accept it

foxxxythnksustnk
February 10th 2013


2131 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

wtfs the point of not obliging to the rating standards of a large community thus making ur ratings worthless

foxxxythnksustnk
February 10th 2013


2131 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

er something rad my review plz

ChopSuey
February 10th 2013


2507 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

Down with the System!!!!

anarchistfish
February 10th 2013


30368 Comments


awful users itt

foxxxythnksustnk
February 10th 2013


2131 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

suck my ass or read my review fuk

foxxxythnksustnk
February 10th 2013


2131 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

af u are scum ew shut up and read

YankeeDudel
February 10th 2013


9342 Comments


And whats wrong with having 80 5s? Surely people who have heard thousands and thousands of albums can pick 80 that they really really like. I mean Godspeed, Brand New, and Slipknot are in a league of their own of course but Im talking about all the other merely mortal bands.

Its just a very dumb system. What to you is "average" since that is the benchmark of all rating systems.

anarchistfish
February 10th 2013


30368 Comments


i read it

was ok

foxxxythnksustnk
February 10th 2013


2131 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

ty :D

anarchistfish
February 10th 2013


30368 Comments


yankee idk whether you're being serious

In which case you're dumb

Or if you're joking

In which case you're dumb for putting that much effort into something i'm not gonna respond to

Either way go away

YankeeDudel
February 10th 2013


9342 Comments


Ah throw some ad hominem around when you have nothing to say. Nice work chachi

anarchistfish
February 10th 2013


30368 Comments


80 5s is dumb cos no one can have that many albums they truly treasure and it sacrifices distinguishing really excellent albums from life changeing ones for distinguishing between bad albums which is tedious and useless so my system is better than everyone else's fuck you

NeoSpaz
February 10th 2013


4533 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5 | Sound Off

5 is the epitome of musical perfection

Chortles
February 10th 2013


21494 Comments


what the fuck even is

YankeeDudel
February 10th 2013


9342 Comments


Ha well hey for a guy with such a strict rating system I thought your high ratings would be some breathtaking immortal albums. Seems you have high and low standards at the same time and you're confused by your own system lol. But do you big boi

anarchistfish
February 10th 2013


30368 Comments


you have a 3.77 average rating come on what's the point



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy