Journal Unlorja
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
TFU82
March 16th 2011


17 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

“I would hardly call this album innovative, unless this is the first metal album you've heard.”



With all of the many, MANY genre tags that have emerged, since the time when there was only Rock, Pop, Metal, Jazz, Rap, Country, and a few others, making such a statement seems very uninformed or even childish. So what you’re saying is that once you’ve heard the metal bands, Led Zeppelin and Black Sabbath (just for example), inherently Journal has nothing new to offer you? Absurd. If that is your perspective, then you are not qualified to determine whether something is innovative or not.



Apples and pears are both fruits, but they each taste very different. Not being able to tell the difference would suggest deficient taste buds.

Ticondaroga
March 18th 2011


231 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

I was hoping i could just put "metal" and be done with it, but nope scrutiny is all i receive in

return. Obviously making a statement like that is a bit of an exaggeration, because i listen to a

lot of metal, in which there are many different genres and i thought id oversimplify the sub genres

and just say metal; hoping that anyone who read my post would realize that.



Haha Led Zeppelin is metal (speaking of qualification)? Ive heard everything the album has had to

offer

before on a collection of metal albums ; executed in a much more satisfactory manor. Black Sabbath

and Led Zeppelin sound completely different than this so i really am unsure of the point your trying

to get across.



Goddamn ignorance FUCK HUMANss.



Ps: Album isn't bad, just isn't as amazing as you guys are hyping it to be. My opinion don't like

it? Va te faire foutre.

TFU82
March 18th 2011


17 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

I personally don't even listen to Led Zepplin, but yes, people would qualify it as metal from that era. My point was to remind you that metal has become a very broad spectrum. Your post, regarding Journal's lack of innovation, implies that if you've heard one metal band, then you've heard them all. Led Zepplin's original genre tag IS metal, and yet you agree that they sound nothing like Journal.



I suspect that what you mean, based on your recent and past comments, is that Journal are not innovative because of the existence of bands like Dillinger and Protest the Hero. Whether you like Journal, Protest, or Dillinger is a matter of opinion, which I do respect, but these bands absolutely do not sound the same.



Your opinion doesn't bother me. It would just be nice if people understood what they were talking about, prior to entering a particular discussion.

iwubmoosik
March 18th 2011


386 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

"I personally don't even listen to Led Zeppelin, but yes, people would qualify it as metal from that era."



What?

TFU82
March 18th 2011


17 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Led_Zeppelin



"Led Zeppelin are regularly cited as one of the progenitors of heavy metal"



LOL! Ok... I guess I shouldn't have used Zeppelin as an example. I was just trying to provide contrast to the "metal" discussion.

iwubmoosik
March 18th 2011


386 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

yeah but progenitor doesn't mean they played metal, it just means they influenced the people who began the musical movement of metal.







TFU82
March 19th 2011


17 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Yes, that's true. Ok. It seems that I am not being clear enough, so I'll just ask the real question that I had in mind, point blank: What other band does Journal sound like?



If the answer is that they sound like no other band, then Journal's music must be at least somewhat innovative.



If they do, indeed, sound like some other band, provide reasons why. Hopefully your analysis goes deeper than just saying "they play fast, they have crazy time changes, and their vocalist screams."

iwubmoosik
March 19th 2011


386 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

now that, i can agree with

qwe3
March 19th 2011


21836 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

guys stfu this album is terrible just stop talking about it and forget it was ever made

iwubmoosik
March 19th 2011


386 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

make me

qwe3
March 19th 2011


21836 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

make me

iwubmoosik
March 19th 2011


386 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

make me

qwe3
March 19th 2011


21836 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

make me

TFU82
March 19th 2011


17 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Nah. It's too much fun. This album brings you pain. It brings me pleasure. And possibly even some additional pleasure that it pains you.

iwubmoosik
March 19th 2011


386 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

make me

qwe3
March 19th 2011


21836 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

make me also lol TFU you like bad music

iwubmoosik
March 19th 2011


386 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

make me, i love bad music, FUCK YEAH

TFU82
March 19th 2011


17 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Hahaha. Hey man, there's no such thing. You like bad pizza. My pizza is superior to yours.

qwe3
March 19th 2011


21836 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

make me

iwubmoosik
March 19th 2011


386 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

make that man a pizza right now



make me



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy