Album Rating: 4.5
Probably the best metal album to be released this year
Well until the new Arsis and Necrophagist albums are released at least
|
| |
and I am a doucher
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
read the 3 and weep.
Listened to this once and it was a 4. Second time 3.5. Third time, 3. Go figure.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
Your ego grows with every comment like that!This Message Edited On 03.29.08
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
My penis grows with every growl i hear on this.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
LOL
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
Ego: An inflated feeling of pride in your superiority to others
Obviously you feel that there must be something wrong with me that makes me inferior in saying that my brain shrinks with each listen suggesting that there's something about this album that you get, that I don't, disregarding personal taste and opinion, which is what brought you to your 5 in the first place.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
No it wasn't. You meant every word, you just disguised it as a (bad) joke to hide the fact that you want to beat me for giving this a 3 ;)
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
I still dont get why people label this band progressive...I mean...they dont even qualify for the first rule for being a progressive band...
having a 8 minute song
amiritez?
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
well the cooky-talk lyricism overcomes that. They do need a long song though. Without it they just aren't as cool and they certainly have that epic-factor that would really make a long song shine.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
na i think pth should just stick with shorter songs..not many other bands I heard can make a 3-4 minute track feel as epic as theirs I must admit
and they did it on alot of songs
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Suppose...and I've discussed this before...Palm's Read and Limb From Limb was one song. It would transform from being 2 great songs to probably one of my favorite songs ever. But since it is two it's just less good.
I am really into long songs so this may just be my opinion. I feel a short track means they just didn't have enough ideas to make it longer and even better.This Message Edited On 03.29.08
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
I feel a short track means they just didn't have enough ideas to make it longer and even better
I agree to some extent, but I also feel that sometimes short tracks can really help the flow of an album, keep it moving, keep it feeling/sounding fresh, and make it a bit easier to listen to.
That's what I love about Back to Times of Splendor; 8 minute song, 5 minute song, 7 minute song, 15 minute song, 5 minute song, 17 minute song. If ALL the tracks were 8 or 10 minutes plus, it would start to drag. The shorter songs mix it up perfectly.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
I know, I was just using it to exemplify that this album isn't lacking just because it doesn't have epic-length songs...
This album is lacking because the lead singer sounds like he's crying cause his g/f left him and he's trying to sound emotive, but he just sounds like a loser lol don't hate me! ;)
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
He sounds like a pussy-whipped whiny punk-ass bitch and it annoys the hell out of me, is what I'm trying to say.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
DAdaddadadadadada shut the FUCK up!
edit: I'm gonna stop now cause I don't like it when someone talks smack about something I like, so I'm shutting up. This Message Edited On 03.29.08
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
jabs cant hold water lol
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
I wasn't trying to be insightful. I was being silly.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
I personally like his voice a lot but that's because i like high-pitch singers. Back to the length thing, i don't think all the tracks need to be 10 minutes long...i just think long songs would suit them very well because of their elements.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
It's true, instead of switching so quickly back and forth between the different tempos and soft and hard passages they could maybe linger on each a little more and give them more of an impact. Of course hardcore PTH fans would probably say that would mess up their style...
|
| |
|
|
