Album Rating: 1.0

Idk why anyone would rate Johann Pachelbel anything above a 1.5 u just look dumb

Album Rating: 1.5 | Sound Off

i dont revenge rate shit tho i listen to everything properly



it is sad only i can rate things properly tho agreed

Album Rating: 2.5

Haha

Album Rating: 2.5

Goodolboy ur right I got mad. I shouldnt have called you a boomer and said you take the gay cock, that was wrong of me.

Album Rating: 1.5

what is the difference between a cock and a gay cock??

Album Rating: 1.5 | Sound Off

was wondering the same thing



sneakers would know tho

Album Rating: 2.5

Its funnier when you say gay cock

Album Rating: 1.5

It becomes gay when you suck the would be straight cock

Album Rating: 1.5 | Sound Off

oh so reverse conversion therapy

Album Rating: 1.5

Is it gay only if a gay person sucks it off? If a straight person was to suck it would it be considered gay? so many questions. so little time

Album Rating: 1.5 | Sound Off

nah its just a prank bro

Album Rating: 1.5

Yes, don't do it

Album Rating: 2.5

Just the tip, just for a second

Album Rating: 1.0

This > Hate Crew Deathroll agreed

Album Rating: 1.5 | Sound Off

wow ur mad



good thing i dOnT GiVe a fLyInG FuCk mOtHeRfUcKeR

Album Rating: 1.0

You cared enough to respond, so it's working :D

Album Rating: 1.0







my issue with this is that it eliminates the need to truly intellectually challenge yourself with the artist's/act's vision. a lot of music is special and it will be ignored and excluded because of this system. it even ignores the value that a bad album can have. i rate my music based on an attempt at illustrating a piece of music's objective value based on how i feel/look at it. i enjoy it when an artist creates something great, so i will recognize it as great whether it has literally changed my life or not. it only focuses on albums that you REALLY like and ignores every other album that's really special. this system is not positive; it's negative. it fails to display the positives that a flawed album can objectively have if there is an attempt by you to recognize it. this system is intellectually deficient. it's not even a rating. it's a categorization by how much you give a fuck about an album instead of what's so great about an album. the idea of just slapping an album a 0.5 just because you personally don't give a fuck about it is stupid. you can perfectly comprehend what i like AND dislike by looking at my ratings instead of your stupid system which is just exclusive and negative

Album Rating: 1.5 | Sound Off

thats trv i need to stop saying things

Album Rating: 1.5 | Sound Off

FUCK

my issue with this is that it eliminates the need to truly intellectually challenge yourself with the artist's/act's vision. a lot of music is special and it will be ignored and excluded because of this system. it even ignores the value that a bad album can have. i rate my music based on an attempt at illustrating a piece of music's objective value based on how i feel/look at it. i enjoy it when an artist creates something great, so i will recognize it as great whether it has literally changed my life or not. it only focuses on albums that you REALLY like and ignores every other album that's really special. this system is not positive; it's negative. it fails to display the positives that a flawed album can objectively have if there is an attempt by you to recognize it. this system is intellectually deficient. it's not even a rating. it's a categorization by how much you give a fuck about an album instead of what's so great about an album. the idea of just slapping an album a 0.5 just because you personally don't give a fuck about it is stupid. you can perfectly comprehend what i like AND dislike by looking at my ratings instead of your stupid system which is just exclusive and negative