Album Rating: 2.0
raise your hand if you've listened to vancouver
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
dont like the vocals on vancouver as much
untitled rules but its too short
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
*raises hand*
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
i was blown away at how much better it was than this. they're a great band when they're playing hard and fast, but it's when they go all experimental (which they perceive as drawing out their songs to triple the suitable length) that they lose their appeal. in my opinion of course.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
This has grown on me a lot lately.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
"i was blown away at how much better it was than this. they're a great band when they're playing hard and fast, but it's when they go all experimental (which they perceive as drawing out their songs to triple the suitable length) that they lose their appeal. in my opinion of course."
yea, that makes sense even though I think it is the exact opposite for me; I love their experimental side way more.
|
| |
still think this blows
|
| |
Still think it rules.
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
dont kid yourself kid this sucks
|
| |
I don't agree
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
you should
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
This is starting to really click for me. I need to listen to it more.
|
| |
Probs.
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
woah something josh d. likes
|
| |
I've always liked this.
|
| |
I would give this a 3.
Good lyrics but boring at times.
|
| |
yeah this is good on paper but it gets pretty boring
warrants a 3
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
might drop this. it rules. yeah. but not as much as it used to.
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
drop it like it's shit
cuz you know i'm right feit
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Really digging what I have heard from this so far.
|
| |
|
|