Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off

Yeah Gore is pretty bad

Album Rating: 2.5

it's almost as bad as this.

Album Rating: 3.5

They've released enough songs for one solid 12 track album that I'd 4.5 - none of their albums are realistically above a 3.5

Album Rating: 3.5

Deftones isn't even a band

Album Rating: 3.0

Lust is incredible. Gets better every time I listen.

Album Rating: 3.5

Only screwy thing about fantano's gore review is iirc it wasnt much lower than his kny review

Album Rating: 2.5

Up pops Riahanna, pffft slag. Bin. [2]

"Only screwy thing about fantano's gore review is iirc it wasnt much lower than his kny review"

Yeah, and I've noticed that same thing with him before with other bands. Like, he'll seem to think an album is marginally better/worse than a band's previous effort and then only rate it 1 number higher or lower

so, if it's slightly better, it's slightly better?

Album Rating: 3.0

"Like, he'll seem to think an album is marginally better/worse than a band's previous effort and then only rate it 1 number higher or lower"



oh yes what a sinner i'll tie him up and you can burn him at the stake

Album Rating: 5.0

fockin bludy slag mate

I think his assessment of this album is accurate, though. TPAB is a much better album, but this is not bad, it's just inconsistent and has some questionable moments.

Album Rating: 3.0

oh yer she's slagqueen central

"oh yes what a sinner i'll tie him up and you can burn him at the stake"

You act like I am riled up. Another guy pointed out an inconsistency in how he rates albums sometimes and I agreed.

Album Rating: 3.5

It's like Lady Gaga popping up halfway through Straight Outta Compton.

Album Rating: 3.5

Rihanna feature is pretty good

Album Rating: 3.5

It would've been on an Eminem album doof dude.

For 5mins I actually thought this was 'real deal'

Album Rating: 3.5

Zak - did you ever buy into the Eminem thing? Hand on heart, I did listen to him quite a lot for about six months back in 2001 sort of time

Album Rating: 3.5

Course I did mate. His second album was great, but he was just such a massive bellend it all got instantly forgotten about.

Album Rating: 3.0

"You act like I am riled up. Another guy pointed out an inconsistency in how he rates albums sometimes and I agreed."



i'm just takin the piss mate, and i don't understand the point in the first place since everyone consciously does that all the time because as subjective as music is, if there's four mentally stable blokes in a band, there's four mentally stable blokes in a band. There are always going to be bands with marginally better/worse albums in their discography left right and centre.

And besides there is just as much evidence to the contrary i.e Animal Collective, Radiohead, Travis Scott, Burial, PJ Harvey, Sun Kil Moon, Thundercat, just from the top of my head -- going from 9/10 to 3/10 is pretty much the opposite of "he'll seem to think an album is marginally better/worse than a band's previous effort and then only rate it 1 number higher or lower".