Ne Obliviscaris Portal of I
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
Oceandrowned
June 6th 2016


1067 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Hey, i dont hear it overpowers anything in this record. In fact this production is one of the better metal production I've listened to past 2 years. But it might sound different ofc, some of the players, headphones, etc, has been leaning towards bass and non-flat response EQ, so you might getting this from your equipment (double-bass overpowering all instruments in that range, etc). But I agree, drums are extremely loud these days. People just want too much bass.

SgtShock
June 6th 2016


948 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

The "we get it dude youve got the fastest feet in australia" thing made me laugh pretty hard.

The double bass "wall" is a bit overused here in term of composition, but mix wise I don't think it's too oppressive. When I saw them live it was a different story, though. Definitely overpowered the mix like you're saying.

Asdfp277
June 6th 2016


25732 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

it's fine

SgtShock
June 6th 2016


948 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Def not as loud as Gojiras drums. The way of all flesh especially

SacredSerenity
June 7th 2016


834 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Drums are fine for me.

Snide
July 10th 2016


7049 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Need to revisit this at some point.

LeSonataWishPark
July 10th 2016


247 Comments


5 THIS OR DERP

beefshoes
July 11th 2016


8448 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

The most recent album a bit better imo.

The production keeps me from giving it a 5 though. It's too sterile.

Hawks
Staff Reviewer
July 11th 2016


116904 Comments

Album Rating: 4.7

This is sooooo much better than Citadel.

Hawks
Staff Reviewer
July 11th 2016


116904 Comments

Album Rating: 4.7

Not really, it's just super cheesy and boring. Like this is cheesy too, but it doesn't overdo it and Citadel really, really does.

LeSonataWishPark
July 11th 2016


247 Comments


Citadel is really good, but this is in a whole new level

BallsDeep
July 11th 2016


4642 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

I love the little openning track to citadel tho the spooky violin gives me goosies hehe

SacredSerenity
July 11th 2016


834 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

The first three-song-piece on Citadel is kinda boring compared to this record, the rest is fine

LeSonataWishPark
July 11th 2016


247 Comments


Citadel is harder to get into

ZippaThaRippa
July 11th 2016


10674 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Mostly because it sucks

Hawks
Staff Reviewer
July 11th 2016


116904 Comments

Album Rating: 4.7

Yeah.

BallsDeep
July 11th 2016


4642 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Let's see you produce a better album Zippa

beefshoes
July 11th 2016


8448 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

If anything, I think that Citadel is a more concise take of what they did with this album albeit with more clean vocals and less experimentation. My only real criticism of it is the production. The double tracked vocals are annoying, and the vocals sound much better live. The drum production is annoying to me as well, but that doesn't take anything away from it since the triggered shite is the norm in contemporary metal. It doesn't excuse it though.

SgtShock
July 11th 2016


948 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

I'll have to agree with Beefshoes on those double-tracked vocals. They really kill the vibe on Painters of the Tempest. I think it's great that the vocalist can do low growls and high shrieks, but both at once in that song comes off as super forced and distracting.

beefshoes
July 11th 2016


8448 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Listen to this live performance and compare: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGqwORzfKQs

It's so good that I'd pay to have a copy without the double tracking.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy