Cannibal Corpse Tomb of the Mutilated
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
gasmaskman
September 8th 2007


1006 Comments


I think the Barnes era is underrated (well, not that underrated), and the Fisher era is (way) overrated.

CoRpSeSlAyEr
September 8th 2007


855 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

Barnes's voice was amazing while with corpse. The only time it was good with sfu was on Haunted, so his voice got worse. Fisher on the other hand, his voice got so much better during his era with corpse. I can't chose one over the other though.

LifeInABox
September 8th 2007


3709 Comments


Barnes is horrible everywhere but here tbh.

CoRpSeSlAyEr
September 8th 2007


855 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

What do you mean? Only on TOTM, or with corpse all together? Haunted is still a good album by sfu, and some sfu songs after that are at least descent.

LifeInABox
September 8th 2007


3709 Comments


Corpse all together. I can't stand SFU.

LifeInABox
September 24th 2007


3709 Comments


Did someone neg this? I think it's pretty good for a tbt.

rattlehead42147
September 26th 2007


1345 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

the intro riff to hammer was stolen from premature autopsy by entombed i believe it was.

LifeInABox
September 26th 2007


3709 Comments


Maybe a little bit, I hear it.

LifeInABox
October 7th 2007


3709 Comments


Ok, so honestly, was this review that bad? I think it's a pretty good tbt.

DeathMetal123
October 18th 2007


3 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

This Is A Great Album Also...but i think butchered at birth was the best album..but this one is great too!!

DeathMetal123
October 18th 2007


3 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

yeah six feet under sucks!!!barnes voice was only good in the first three cannibal corpse albums but he sucked after that

CoRpSeSlAyEr
October 18th 2007


855 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

YES!!! Someone else that thinks that BAB is their best album. I disagree about his voice only good on the first 3 albums, it was good on the Bleeding, and okay on SFU's Haunting.

Confessed2005
October 18th 2007


5962 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

I think he was at his most guttural here. It's most impressive.

CoRpSeSlAyEr
October 18th 2007


855 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

Yeah, this was really revolutionary for it's time, (Chris's vocals that is).

LifeInABox
October 18th 2007


3709 Comments


I think he was at his most guttural here. It's most impressive.
Agreed.

BallsToTheWall
October 23rd 2007


51518 Comments


I still cannot get enough of Hammer Smashed Face. The only C.C album I enjoy other than Kill.

goneshootin22
November 25th 2007


142 Comments


Suddenly this band really grew on me. Im used to the vocals now and who cares about lyrics if you cant understand him anyway? All you have left after you put those 2 things aside is solid instrumentals. But the intro to Addicted to vaginal skin scares my friends.

robonguitar
February 16th 2008


54 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Reading some of the earlier comments: I cant understand why people say they hate them..... yet come and post on their review.... seems kind of weird.



Anyway, killer album and tight musicianship.

LifeInABox
February 17th 2008


3709 Comments


Kindy crappy review.

DeathThrashProg
May 14th 2008


498 Comments


this album is their least interesting album imho... i prefer the newer stuff such as "Gore Obsessed" or "Kill"
like the review though, its a good format



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy