When the only option is to tag something incorrectly or vaguely that it doesn’t help anyone understand what the album is going to sound like then you don’t have enough tags end of storyb
|
| |
Wonder if scientists have these discussion but like... more official
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
this is very twerkable
|
| |
Scientists do in fact listen to music
I’m sure their very relevant educational background also makes their opinions on genre tags carry more weight
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
Yeah don’t talk to me about industrial breakbeat metal unless you’re a nuclear physicist
|
| |
I won’t believe that proper accurate categorization is useful until a rocket scientist tells me so
|
| |
this is very twerkable [2]
|
| |
lol i meant like the argument about "tagging" stuff and the nature of discrimination and nomenclature like... elements, living things, phenomena and stuff like that.
|
| |
Lmao idk bro weren’t you the one just telling us no to take it so seriously ! We goin deep now baby
|
| |
it was just an innocent question. we're just normal men, after all.
|
| |
I’m sure some very pretentious dinner party chats have been had but I doubt it’s a priority beyond that
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
Half the album and it feels mid so far
|
| |
Jamming rn
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
"fuuuuuuuuuck Army Of Non slaps hard. Godflesh makes metal sound cool again. Haven't finished the album yet but so far, review is unfortunately badong."
You should stand for the oposite of badong, gnodab.
|
| |
Oh
My
Glorb
A breakbeat
|
| |
m/mm//m/m/m/mm/m/m/m/
|
| |
Wish the bass was cranked up in the mix tbh
|
| |
Guitars are so entitled
|
| |
Is someone going “uh uh check it out check it out” in the background on army of non
|
| |
lol ye
|
| |
|
|