Album Rating: 4.0
Track list on review says 2. Maybe just split for vinyl, idk.
Tracklist for Mirror Reaper:
1. Mirror Reaper (As Above)
2. Mirror Reaper (So Below)
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
gotcha, probably vinyl then. the "one 83-minute track" seems like part of the schtick for this in most reviews and it's how my promo came.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
On Apple Music it’s just one fat song
|
| |
vinyl doesn't seem like the best fit for this. you want to zone out and lose sense of time not flip records every 20 min
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
Yeah I just like to sit there and let it drown me
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
Definitely agree with that, and was on my mind when listening.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5 | Sound Off
Im glad this is getting so much attention.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
Same, and I just hope the average stays where it is cos it deserves it
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Gonna get cozy and jam this tomorrow night with some sm0k and a bottle of bourbon. Hope I dig. Typically not a fan of one track albums. Really dug Four Phantoms.
|
| |
Cover art reminds me of Beksiński
|
| |
Loved their previous efforts, so I'll probably give this a listen. Also continues their trend of stellar album art.
|
| |
Found this kind of boring, not terrible though. Definitely like Four Phantoms much more.
Cover art best in recent metal memory
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
I wish I could neg Staff reviews
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5 | Sound Off
jamming this now. love the subtle effects. this sounds fucking massive, im entranced.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5 | Sound Off
@bizzles the digital version is just one long track. the CD/vinyl versions contain two tracks, which makes more sense because there does seem to be an end to a song and the start of another one. not that any of this really matters anyways.
|
| |
He voted 3.3 the last BAN lol.
|
| |
jesus fucking christ just pull this kid away from metal reviews
|
| |
at this point i'd prob even take snox over him
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
Lol
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
The more I jam this the more I wonder how anyone could rate this below a 4.
|
| |
|